From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1755714AbYKLWan@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1755714AbYKLWan (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 12 Nov 2008 17:30:43 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755536AbYKLWab
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Wed, 12 Nov 2008 17:30:31 -0500
Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:40904 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1752572AbYKLWaa (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 12 Nov 2008 17:30:30 -0500
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 23:29:45 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
       kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
       "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
       Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
       Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
       pm list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Make NUMA on 32-bit depend on EXPERIMENTAL again
Message-ID: <20081112222945.GB13844@elte.hu>
References: <20081109140726.GB1786@ucw.cz> <200811122257.50998.rjw@sisk.pl> <200811122322.36781.rjw@sisk.pl> <200811122326.16107.rjw@sisk.pl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200811122326.16107.rjw@sisk.pl>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean
X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5
X-ELTE-SpamLevel: 
X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no
X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 
X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_SECURITYSAGE autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3
	-1.5 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
	[score: 0.0000]
	0.0 DNS_FROM_SECURITYSAGE  RBL: Envelope sender in
	blackholes.securitysage.com
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


* Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:

> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
> Subject: x86: Make NUMA on 32-bit depend on EXPERIMENTAL again
> 
> My previous patch to make CONFIG_NUMA on x86_32 depend on BROKEN
> turned out to be unnecessary, after all, since the source of the
> hibernation vs CONFIG_NUMA problem turned out to be the fact that
> we didn't take the NUMA KVA remapping into account in the
> hibernation code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
> Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
> Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/Kconfig |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

applied to tip/x86/numa, thanks Rafael!

	Ingo