From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: procedures
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 07:24:55 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081119072455.e341b8e3.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081118084757.5c92c878.randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1446 bytes --]
Hi Randy,
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008 08:47:57 -0800 Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> wrote:
>
> > The following will cause a tree to be temporarily dropped from linux-next:
> > - non-trivial conflicts with Linus' tree
> > - build failures
>
> One clarification, please.
>
> Does this mean build failures that _you_ see/experience during tree merging
> and not other reported build failures?
Build failures I see during merging will cause the tree to be dropped
immediately (this forces me to not spend time trying to fix others
problems), other build failures may take a day or two before the
offending tree gets identified and dropped (but hopefully it will be
fixed before that happens).
A tree being dropped during merging does not imply fault - it may well be
a combination of trees that is the problem and I am always open to people
explaining things to me. As long as we come up with a solution that I
can carry along. However, most of the build failures I have seen so far
have been unexpected impact on other architectures/configs (than those
tested by the author), procedures gone wrong or carelessness ...
Trees do get picked up again at the next opportunity i.e. I still
fetch, inspect and attempt to merge "dropped" trees just in case people
don't get around to telling me they are fixed.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-18 20:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-12 6:38 Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-18 16:47 ` Randy Dunlap
2008-11-18 20:24 ` Stephen Rothwell [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081119072455.e341b8e3.sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®