From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: "Américo Wang" <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch] MODULE_UNLOAD should depend on PROC_FS
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 10:41:53 +1030 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200811191041.53716.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081118184052.GA24453@hack.voiplan.pt>
On Wednesday 19 November 2008 05:10:52 Américo Wang wrote:
> The feature controlled by MODULE_UNLOAD uses proc interface, so it
> should depend on PROC_FS.
Hi Wang,
This patch looks wrong to me; you can remove modules without /proc. Does
it not compile with CONFIG_MODULE_UNLOAD=y and CONFIG_PROC_FS=n?
Thanks,
Rusty.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-19 0:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-18 18:40 Américo Wang
2008-11-19 0:11 ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2008-11-19 18:48 ` Américo Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200811191041.53716.rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®