From: Bernhard Walle <bwalle@suse.de>
To: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Mingarelli, Thomas" <Thomas.Mingarelli@hp.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"stable@kernel.org" <stable@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [WATCHDOG] [hpwdt] Set the mapped BIOS address space as executable
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 00:02:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081120000215.45071a50@kopernikus.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081119230014.GC30873@infomag.infomag.iguana.be>
* Wim Van Sebroeck [2008-11-20 00:00]:
>
> Hi All,
>
> > * Andrew Morton [2008-11-19 09:30]:
> > > >
> > >
> > > (top-posting repaired. Please don't top-post!)
> > >
> > > I haven't seen any patch which alters hpwdt_pretimeout() and there is
> > > no such patch in linux-next. Perhaps it got lost?
>
> This was the patch (see below). It's in the linux-2.6-watchdog-next tree now,
> so it should go into the linux-next tree soon.
>
> The other patch is in the linux-2.6-watchdog-next tree also.
Wasn't the conclusion that NOTIFY_OK always works and we should not
rely on that 'allow_kdump' option?
Regards,
Bernhard
>
> static void __iomem *pci_mem_addr; /* the PCI-memory address */
> static unsigned long __iomem *hpwdt_timer_reg;
> @@ -485,7 +485,11 @@ static int hpwdt_pretimeout(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long ulReason,
> "Management Log for details.\n");
> }
>
> - return NOTIFY_STOP;
> + /*
> + * for kdump, we must return NOTIFY_OK here to execute the
> + * crash_nmi_callback afterwards, see arch/x86/kernel/crash.c
> + */
> + return allow_kdump ? NOTIFY_OK : NOTIFY_STOP;
> }
>
> /*
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-19 23:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-14 14:47 Bernhard Walle
2008-11-18 22:30 ` Andrew Morton
2008-11-18 22:32 ` Bernhard Walle
2008-11-19 14:05 ` Mingarelli, Thomas
2008-11-19 17:30 ` Andrew Morton
2008-11-19 17:34 ` Bernhard Walle
2008-11-19 23:00 ` Wim Van Sebroeck
2008-11-19 23:02 ` Bernhard Walle [this message]
2008-11-19 23:11 ` Wim Van Sebroeck
2008-11-19 23:39 ` Mingarelli, Thomas
2008-11-20 20:24 ` Wim Van Sebroeck
2008-11-23 13:13 ` Bernhard Walle
2008-11-19 18:34 ` Wim Van Sebroeck
2008-11-18 22:33 ` Mingarelli, Thomas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081120000215.45071a50@kopernikus.site \
--to=bwalle@suse.de \
--cc=Thomas.Mingarelli@hp.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=wim@iguana.be \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®