From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] irq: sparseirq enabling v2
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 08:48:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081126074826.GI26036@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <492B77C5.2050502@kernel.org>
* Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> wrote:
> impact: new feature sparseirq
> v2: use pointer array instead of hash
ok, this looks pretty good!
A few details:
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SPARSE_IRQ
> +#define set_ioapic_affinity_irq set_ioapic_affinity_irq_desc
> +#else
> +static void set_ioapic_affinity_irq(unsigned int irq, cpumask_t mask)
> +{
> + struct irq_desc *desc;
> +
> + desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
> +
> + set_ioapic_affinity_irq_desc(desc, mask);
> +}
> +#endif
i think this distinction can now go away?.
> #ifdef CONFIG_INTR_REMAP
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SPARSE_IRQ
> +static void ack_x2apic_level_desc(struct irq_desc **descp)
> +{
> + ack_x2APIC_irq();
> +}
> +
> +static void ack_x2apic_edge_desc(struct irq_desc **descp)
> +{
> + ack_x2APIC_irq();
> +}
> +
> +#define ack_x2apic_level ack_x2apic_level_desc
> +#define ack_x2apic_edge ack_x2apic_edge_desc
> +#else
is this needed now?
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> + move_native_irq_desc(descp);
> +#endif
please hide this #ifdef in a header.
> +# ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> + move_masked_irq_desc(descp);
> +# endif
ditto.
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SPARSE_IRQ
> +#define ack_apic_edge ack_apic_edge_desc
> +#define ack_apic_level ack_apic_level_desc
> +#else
> +static void ack_apic_edge(unsigned int irq)
> +{
> + struct irq_desc *desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
> +
> + ack_apic_edge_desc(&desc);
> +}
> +static void ack_apic_level(unsigned int irq)
> +{
> + struct irq_desc *desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
> +
> + ack_apic_level_desc(&desc);
> +}
> +#endif
distinction needed?
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SPARSE_IRQ
> +#define mask_lapic_irq mask_lapic_irq_desc
> +#define unmask_lapic_irq unmask_lapic_irq_desc
> +#define ack_lapic_irq ack_lapic_irq_desc
> +#else
> +static void mask_lapic_irq(unsigned int irq)
> +{
> + struct irq_desc *desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
> +
> + mask_lapic_irq_desc(&desc);
> +}
> +static void unmask_lapic_irq(unsigned int irq)
> +{
> + struct irq_desc *desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
> +
> + unmask_lapic_irq_desc(&desc);
> +}
> +static void ack_lapic_irq(unsigned int irq)
> +{
> + struct irq_desc *desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
> +
> + ack_lapic_irq_desc(&desc);
> +}
> +#endif
same.
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SPARSE_IRQ
> + for (new = irq_want; new < NR_IRQS; new++)
> +#else
> + for (new = irq_want; new > 0; new--)
> +#endif
this assymetry seems unnecessary too now i think.
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SPARSE_IRQ
> + irq_want = nr_irqs;
> +#else
> + irq_want = NR_IRQS - 1;
> +#endif
ditto. I think we dont want 'nr_irqs' anymore - just remain with
NR_IRQS, right?
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SPARSE_IRQ
> +#define set_msi_irq_affinity set_msi_irq_affinity_desc
> +#else
> +static void set_msi_irq_affinity(unsigned int irq, cpumask_t mask)
> +{
> + struct irq_desc *desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
>
> + set_msi_irq_affinity_desc(desc, mask);
> +}
> +#endif
This ifdef seems unnecessary too.
Plus in a few more places.
Please look at _every_ #ifdef or #if in your patch in a .c file and
ask the question: can we somehow in some way eliminate it and convert
it to some nice inline somewhere or eliminate it via some other trick?
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-26 7:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-24 2:59 [PATCH 1/2] irq: sparseirq enabling Yinghai Lu
2008-11-24 14:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-24 19:22 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-11-24 22:26 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-11-25 3:57 ` [PATCH 1/2] irq: sparseirq enabling v2 Yinghai Lu
2008-11-25 3:58 ` [PATCH 2/2] irq: move irq_desc according to smp_affinity v2 Yinghai Lu
2008-11-26 7:48 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-11-26 8:02 ` [PATCH 1/2] irq: sparseirq enabling v2 Yinghai Lu
2008-11-26 8:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-26 18:33 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-11-27 2:26 ` [PATCH 1/2] irq: sparseirq enabling v3 Yinghai Lu
2008-11-27 2:26 ` [PATCH 2/2] irq: move irq_desc according to smp_affinity v3 Yinghai Lu
2008-11-28 16:34 ` [PATCH 1/2] irq: sparseirq enabling v3 Ingo Molnar
2008-11-29 7:13 ` [PATCH] irq: sparseirq enabling v4 Yinghai Lu
2008-11-29 10:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-29 10:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-01 4:44 ` [PATCH] irq: sparse irq_desc[] support - fix Yinghai Lu
2008-11-29 10:57 ` [PATCH] irq: sparseirq enabling v4 Sam Ravnborg
2008-11-29 14:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-29 17:54 ` Sam Ravnborg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081126074826.GI26036@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome