mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] irq: sparseirq enabling v2
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 08:48:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081126074826.GI26036@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <492B77C5.2050502@kernel.org>


* Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> wrote:

> impact: new feature sparseirq

> v2: use pointer array instead of hash

ok, this looks pretty good!

A few details:

> +#ifdef CONFIG_SPARSE_IRQ
> +#define set_ioapic_affinity_irq set_ioapic_affinity_irq_desc
> +#else
> +static void set_ioapic_affinity_irq(unsigned int irq, cpumask_t mask)
> +{
> +	struct irq_desc *desc;
> +
> +	desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
> +
> +	set_ioapic_affinity_irq_desc(desc, mask);
> +}
> +#endif

i think this distinction can now go away?.

>  #ifdef CONFIG_INTR_REMAP
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SPARSE_IRQ
> +static void ack_x2apic_level_desc(struct irq_desc **descp)
> +{
> +	ack_x2APIC_irq();
> +}
> +
> +static void ack_x2apic_edge_desc(struct irq_desc **descp)
> +{
> +	ack_x2APIC_irq();
> +}
> +
> +#define ack_x2apic_level ack_x2apic_level_desc
> +#define ack_x2apic_edge ack_x2apic_edge_desc
> +#else

is this needed now?

> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> +	move_native_irq_desc(descp);
> +#endif

please hide this #ifdef in a header.

> +# ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> +			move_masked_irq_desc(descp);
> +# endif

ditto.

> +#ifdef CONFIG_SPARSE_IRQ
> +#define ack_apic_edge ack_apic_edge_desc
> +#define ack_apic_level ack_apic_level_desc
> +#else
> +static void ack_apic_edge(unsigned int irq)
> +{
> +	struct irq_desc *desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
> +
> +	ack_apic_edge_desc(&desc);
> +}
> +static void ack_apic_level(unsigned int irq)
> +{
> +	struct irq_desc *desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
> +
> +	ack_apic_level_desc(&desc);
> +}
> +#endif

distinction needed?

>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SPARSE_IRQ
> +#define mask_lapic_irq mask_lapic_irq_desc
> +#define unmask_lapic_irq unmask_lapic_irq_desc
> +#define ack_lapic_irq ack_lapic_irq_desc
> +#else
> +static void mask_lapic_irq(unsigned int irq)
> +{
> +	struct irq_desc *desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
> +
> +	mask_lapic_irq_desc(&desc);
> +}
> +static void unmask_lapic_irq(unsigned int irq)
> +{
> +	struct irq_desc *desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
> +
> +	unmask_lapic_irq_desc(&desc);
> +}
> +static void ack_lapic_irq(unsigned int irq)
> +{
> +	struct irq_desc *desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
> +
> +	ack_lapic_irq_desc(&desc);
> +}
> +#endif

same.

> +#ifdef CONFIG_SPARSE_IRQ
> +	for (new = irq_want; new < NR_IRQS; new++)
> +#else
> +	for (new = irq_want; new > 0; new--)
> +#endif

this assymetry seems unnecessary too now i think.

> +#ifdef CONFIG_SPARSE_IRQ
> +	irq_want = nr_irqs;
> +#else
> +	irq_want = NR_IRQS - 1;
> +#endif

ditto. I think we dont want 'nr_irqs' anymore - just remain with 
NR_IRQS, right?

> +#ifdef CONFIG_SPARSE_IRQ
> +#define set_msi_irq_affinity set_msi_irq_affinity_desc
> +#else
> +static void set_msi_irq_affinity(unsigned int irq, cpumask_t mask)
> +{
> +	struct irq_desc *desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
>  
> +	set_msi_irq_affinity_desc(desc, mask);
> +}
> +#endif

This ifdef seems unnecessary too.

Plus in a few more places.

Please look at _every_ #ifdef or #if in your patch in a .c file and 
ask the question: can we somehow in some way eliminate it and convert 
it to some nice inline somewhere or eliminate it via some other trick?

	Ingo

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-11-26  7:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-11-24  2:59 [PATCH 1/2] irq: sparseirq enabling Yinghai Lu
2008-11-24 14:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-24 19:22   ` Yinghai Lu
2008-11-24 22:26     ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-11-25  3:57   ` [PATCH 1/2] irq: sparseirq enabling v2 Yinghai Lu
2008-11-25  3:58     ` [PATCH 2/2] irq: move irq_desc according to smp_affinity v2 Yinghai Lu
2008-11-26  7:48     ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-11-26  8:02       ` [PATCH 1/2] irq: sparseirq enabling v2 Yinghai Lu
2008-11-26  8:17         ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-26 18:33           ` Yinghai Lu
2008-11-27  2:26           ` [PATCH 1/2] irq: sparseirq enabling v3 Yinghai Lu
2008-11-27  2:26             ` [PATCH 2/2] irq: move irq_desc according to smp_affinity v3 Yinghai Lu
2008-11-28 16:34             ` [PATCH 1/2] irq: sparseirq enabling v3 Ingo Molnar
2008-11-29  7:13               ` [PATCH] irq: sparseirq enabling v4 Yinghai Lu
2008-11-29 10:02                 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-29 10:26                   ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-01  4:44                     ` [PATCH] irq: sparse irq_desc[] support - fix Yinghai Lu
2008-11-29 10:57                   ` [PATCH] irq: sparseirq enabling v4 Sam Ravnborg
2008-11-29 14:33                     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-29 17:54                       ` Sam Ravnborg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20081126074826.GI26036@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome