mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@ioremap.net>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: john@johnmccutchan.com, arnd@arndb.de, mtk.manpages@gmail.com,
	hch@lst.de, rlove@rlove.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pavel@suse.cz,
	davidn@davidnewall.com, Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [take2] Inotify: nested attributes support.
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 11:29:36 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081126082936.GB17525@ioremap.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081126001538.4b1c7c99.akpm@linux-foundation.org>

On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 12:15:38AM -0800, Andrew Morton (akpm@linux-foundation.org) wrote:
> OK, so we have a super-duper framework which will allow us to add pids
> (and other things) to inotify messages.

Yup :)

> This still doesn't provide a reason for anyone to be interested in the
> code!  Why do we want pids in inotify messages?
 
I actually cared only about myself :)
I started the thread and implementation, because my application has to
differentiate IO made by itself and any IO made by system (another
users, crons, whatever else), inotify did not give me that info, so I
extended it. As of others: PID/TID may be used by watching applications
to reduce own load to not process own IO, things like beagle may show
who actually made changes into the file.

> And how does this work give that pids are (no longer) system-wide unique?

It gets pids from the caller's task_struct (via current), so its data is
as unique as process calling getpid() or syscall(__NR_gettid).

-- 
	Evgeniy Polyakov

  reply	other threads:[~2008-11-26  8:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-11-25 19:42 Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-11-25 19:44 ` [take2] Inotify: nested attributes test application Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-11-26  0:24 ` [take2] Inotify: nested attributes support Andrew Morton
2008-11-26  7:42   ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-11-26  8:15     ` Andrew Morton
2008-11-26  8:29       ` Evgeniy Polyakov [this message]
2008-11-26  8:38         ` Andrew Morton
2008-11-26  8:46           ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-11-26 12:47         ` David Newall
2008-11-26 12:51           ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-11-26 13:03             ` David Newall
2008-11-26 13:15               ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-12-04  8:43         ` Pavel Machek
2008-12-04  9:09           ` Evgeniy Polyakov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20081126082936.GB17525@ioremap.net \
    --to=zbr@ioremap.net \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=davidn@davidnewall.com \
    --cc=eparis@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=john@johnmccutchan.com \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
    --cc=pavel@suse.cz \
    --cc=rlove@rlove.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome