mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Pirko <jpirko@redhat.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] getrusage: fill ru_maxrss value
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 17:53:08 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081202175308.5d9ca9f7@psychotron.englab.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081202160507.GA14524@redhat.com>

On Tue, 2 Dec 2008 17:05:07 +0100
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote:

> On 12/02, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> >
> > Based on the patch previously posted by Frank Mayhar:
> > http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-kernel/2007/9/20/264772
> >
> > Changed to do not panic and to set the value properly. Also made some
> > modifications as Oleg suggested. maxrss value is set to pages as "time"
> > application converts it co KBs.
> >
> > This patch enables "time" application to show maxresident value
> > correctly.
> 
> I believe the changelog could be a bit more descriptive ;)
> And I think the patch needs more CCs. (Hugh and Michael cc'ed).
> 
> What about exec? Should we preserve signal_struct->maxrss, or should
> we reset it? I don't know what is the right behaviour, but imho it
> should be consistent with task_mem()/xacct_add_tsk(). And since
> bprm_mm_init() does not copy ->hiwater_xxx, perhaps we should reset.
> Or we should change the exec_mmap() path to preserve ->hiwater_xxx,
> I dunno.
> 
> > Note that even without this patch applied there is a race between two
> > parallel update_hiwater_rss() callers.
> >
> > [...snip...]
> > @@ -1051,6 +1051,8 @@ NORET_TYPE void do_exit(long code)
> >  	if (tsk->mm) {
> >  		update_hiwater_rss(tsk->mm);
> >  		update_hiwater_vm(tsk->mm);
> > +
> > +		tsk->signal->maxrss = tsk->mm->hiwater_rss;
> 
> Yes. But still it is not good the patch adds new racy calls
> (k_getrusage() too). And in fact I think this code in do_exit()
> should die, and we can update signal->maxrss in exit_mm().
> 
> Unless I missed something, the "if (tsk->mm) {}" code in
> do_exit() is not needed because xacct_add_tsk() is not right
> anyway. What we imho need is get_mm_hiwater_xxx(), can be
> also used by task_mm().
> 
> I'll send the patch a bit later, then we can tweak this patch.
> 
> Do you agree?
Okay.

Jirka
> 
> (just in case, I don't mean that mm/ uses update_hiwater_xxx()
>  "safely", afaics try_to_unmap can race with unmap_region
>  for example, but still).
> 
> Oleg.
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-12-02 16:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-12-02 12:18 Jiri Pirko
2008-12-02 16:05 ` Oleg Nesterov
2008-12-02 16:50   ` Michael Kerrisk
2008-12-02 16:53   ` Jiri Pirko [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-11-24 16:02 Jiri Pirko
2008-11-24 18:00 ` Oleg Nesterov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20081202175308.5d9ca9f7@psychotron.englab.brq.redhat.com \
    --to=jpirko@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®