mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adam M Belay <abelay@MIT.EDU>
To: Witold Szczeponik <Witold.Szczeponik@gmx.net>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>,
	rjw@sisk.pl
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PNPACPI: Enable Power Support
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2008 21:49:10 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081208214910.6l58csoke98gw48w@webmail.mit.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <493D8A1F.2090907@gmx.net>

Hi Witold,

All in all your patch looks good, especially in the context of
resolving the Thinkpad 600X issue.  I have some patches on the
way that will add more complete power management support to the
PNP stack and hopefully allow for runtime PM of these system
devices, but I think this is a good short-term solution.

One quick comment.  acpi_bus_set_power() can fail, and
pnpacpi_set_resources() needs to handle this gracefully.  Please
update the patch to include this.

Also, for the follow up to this patch, I'm wondering what sort
of ACPI behavior we need to support D1 and D2 states.  In PCI,
disabling resource decoding (similar to _DIS) is only required
for entering D3.  The ACPI spec seems to be ambiguous with this
issue.  Len, any thoughts?

Thanks,
Adam

Quoting Witold Szczeponik <Witold.Szczeponik@gmx.net>:

> Subject: Enable PNPACPI _PSx Support
>
>
> (This is an updated patch of http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/11/23/211)
>
> This patch sets the power of PnP ACPI devices to D0 when they
> are activated and to D3 when they are disabled.  The latter is
> in correspondence with the ACPI 3.0 specification, whereas the
> former is added in order to be able to power up a device after
> it has been previously disabled (or when booting up a system).
> (As a consequence, the patch makes the PnP ACPI code more ACPI
> compliant.)
>
> Section 6.2.2 of the ACPI Specification (at least versions 1.0b
> and 3.0a) states: "Prior to running this control method [_DIS],
> the OS[PM] will have already put the device in the D3 state."
> Unfortunately, there is no clear statement as to when to put
> a device in the D0 state. :-( Therefore, the patch executes the
> method calls as _PS3/_DIS and _SRS/_PS0. What is clear: "If the
> device is disabled, _SRS enables the device at the specified
> resources." (From the ACPI 3.0a Specification.)
>
> The patch fixes a problem with some IBM ThinkPads (at least the
> 600E and the 600X) where the serial ports have a dedicated
> power source that needs to be brought up before the serial port
> can be used.  Without this patch, the serial port is enabled
> but has no power. (In the past, the tpctl utility had to be
> utilized to turn on the power, but support for this feature
> stopped with version 5.9 as it did not support the more recent
> kernel versions.)
>
> No regressions were observed on hardware that does not require
> this patch.
>
> The patch is applied against 2.6.27.8 (vanilla).
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Witold Szczeponik <Witold.Szczeponik@gmx.net>
>
>
> Index: linux/drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/core.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/core.c
> +++ linux/drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/core.c
> @@ -98,17 +98,20 @@ static int pnpacpi_set_resources(struct
>  	status = acpi_set_current_resources(handle, &buffer);
>  	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
>  		ret = -EINVAL;
> +	else
> +		acpi_bus_set_power(handle, ACPI_STATE_D0);
>  	kfree(buffer.pointer);
>  	return ret;
>  }
>
>  static int pnpacpi_disable_resources(struct pnp_dev *dev)
>  {
> +	acpi_handle handle = dev->data;
>  	acpi_status status;
>
>  	/* acpi_unregister_gsi(pnp_irq(dev, 0)); */
> -	status = acpi_evaluate_object((acpi_handle) dev->data,
> -				      "_DIS", NULL, NULL);
> +	acpi_bus_set_power(handle, ACPI_STATE_D3);
> +	status = acpi_evaluate_object(handle, "_DIS", NULL, NULL);
>  	return ACPI_FAILURE(status) ? -ENODEV : 0;
>  }
>
>



  reply	other threads:[~2008-12-09  3:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-12-08 20:57 Witold Szczeponik
2008-12-09  2:49 ` Adam M Belay [this message]
2008-12-09  3:00   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2008-12-09  3:25     ` Adam M Belay
2008-12-10 19:32   ` Witold Szczeponik
2008-12-10  9:53 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-12-10 10:22   ` Oliver Neukum
2008-12-10 23:26     ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-12-10 19:30   ` Witold Szczeponik
2008-12-10 23:21     ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-12-11  1:28       ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2008-12-11  1:50         ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20081208214910.6l58csoke98gw48w@webmail.mit.edu \
    --to=abelay@mit.edu \
    --cc=Witold.Szczeponik@gmx.net \
    --cc=bjorn.helgaas@hp.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®