From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: Ken Chen <kenchen@google.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [patch] x86: convert rdtscll() to use __native_read_tsc
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 11:15:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081216101551.GA27481@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49477452.6030307@goop.org>
* Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> wrote:
> Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> The reason for the __native_read_tsc() / native_read_tsc() distinction
>> is and obscure problem with paravirt function pointers. Such
>> constructs:
>>
>> ./xen/enlighten.c: .read_tsc = native_read_tsc,
>>
>> do not always work fine with all versions of gcc, if native_read_tsc()
>> is a simple static inline (as it should be) - the build would fail with
>> certain gcc flags.
>
> I don't think that's true. We rely on taking function pointers of
> static inlines pretty extensively; native_read_tsc is hardly unique in
> this respect. I don't remember seeing any problems of the sort you
> describe. (I can well believe this may have been a problem at some
> point, but not during the pv-ops development timeframe.)
i do remember build and boot failures there - with weird combos of gcc
options. It's a clear GCC bug. Anyway, we can clean this up and we'll see
how relevant the failure modes are.
>> Perhaps the real fix is to do this rename as well:
>>
>> native_read_tsc => native_read_tsc_paravirt
>> __native_read_tsc => native_read_tsc
>>
>> as this makes the native_read_tsc_paravirt() a pure technical variant,
>> to be used in paravirt_ops function pointer assignments. People would
>> thus just use the obvious native_read_tsc() inline function most of the
>> time and could forget about native_read_tsc_paravirt().
>>
>> Jeremy?
>
> I'm trying to remember the real reason for
> __native_read_tsc/native_read_tsc. At least part of it is that
> __native_read_tsc is used in a vdso, and so *must* be inlined to avoid a
> bogus call from user to kernel space. But I don't know why you wouldn't
> want to inline native_read_tsc everywhere. I have a feeling it may be a
> relic from unification - possibly because x86-64 was late to the
> clocksource party - but I don't remember anything specific.
>
> I think we can probably make do with a single native_read_tsc, so long
> as its always inlined.
agreed mostly, with this twist: vdso inlining dependencies should be
expressed explicitly, via:
native_vread_tsc()
but we can also make native_read_tsc() __always_inline [it's a single
instruction with basically no preparatory halo around that instruction]
and document the vdso detail there.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-16 10:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-16 8:32 Ken Chen
2008-12-16 9:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-16 9:26 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-12-16 10:15 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-12-17 8:07 ` Ken Chen
2008-12-18 13:31 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081216101551.GA27481@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=kenchen@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®