Re: [PATCH, RESEND] getrusage: fill ru_maxrss value

[Jiri Pirko <jpirko@redhat.com>]

On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 16:20:54 +0100
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote:

> On 12/16, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> >
> > This patch makes ->ru_maxrss value in struct rusage filled accordingly to
> > rss hiwater mark. This struct is filled as a parameter to
> > getrusage syscall. ->ru_maxrss value is set to pages which might be correct
> > as "time" application converts it to KBs.
> >
> > To make this happen we extend struct signal_struct by two fields. The
> > first one is ->maxrss which we use to store rss hiwater of the task. The
> > second one is ->cmaxrss which we use to store highest rss hiwater of all
> > task childs. These values are used in k_getrusage() to actually fill
> > ->ru_maxrss. k_getrusage() uses current rss hiwater value directly
> > if mm struct exists.
> >
> > We clear the ->maxrss as a part of flush_old_exec() to be consistent
> > because bprm_mm_init() does not copy ->hiwater_rss.
> 
> Imho the patch is fine, but
> 
> > @@ -1598,6 +1601,15 @@ static void k_getrusage(struct task_struct *p, int who, struct rusage *r)
> >  out:
> >  	cputime_to_timeval(utime, &r->ru_utime);
> >  	cputime_to_timeval(stime, &r->ru_stime);
> > +
> > +	task_lock(p);
> > +	if (p->mm) {
> > +		unsigned long maxrss = get_mm_hiwater_rss(p->mm);
> > +
> > +		if (r->ru_maxrss < maxrss)
> > +			r->ru_maxrss = maxrss;
> > +	}
> > +	task_unlock(p);
> 
> I think the code above should check "if (who != RUSAGE_CHILDREN) ?
Yes of course it should. Sorry I missed that :/ Will do new patch.
> 
> Oleg.
>