From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759249AbYLPWF2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Dec 2008 17:05:28 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758887AbYLPWFG (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Dec 2008 17:05:06 -0500 Received: from ns2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:52619 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751786AbYLPWFF (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Dec 2008 17:05:05 -0500 Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 23:05:02 +0100 From: Nick Piggin To: Ingo Molnar Cc: "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" , Andrew Morton , Hugh Dickins , "hpa@zytor.com" , "tglx@linutronix.de" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch 0/7] x86 PAT: v2 - track pfnmap mappings with remap_pfn_range and vm_insert_pfn Message-ID: <20081216220502.GC22722@wotan.suse.de> References: <20081126002157.475142000@intel.com> <7E82351C108FA840AB1866AC776AEC464338C11E@orsmsx505.amr.corp.intel.com> <20081216195154.GB4501@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20081216195154.GB4501@elte.hu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 08:51:54PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Pallipadi, Venkatesh wrote: > > > Ingo, > > > > Haven't seen any comments on the patches here. Can you push these > > patches along to tip. > > while the main focus of the changes are x86, they touch the MM > non-trivially too: > > include/linux/mm.h | 9 +++++++++ > mm/memory.c | 7 +++---- > 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > mm/memory.c | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > include/linux/mm.h | 3 +++ > mm/memory.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 46 insertions(+) > > include/linux/mm.h | 6 +++++ > mm/memory.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > 2 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > So when you sent this a month ago i asked the MM folks whether they have > any problems with these patches. Acks (or objections) from Andrew, Nick or > Hugh would be nice to have. Last I looked at them, I think all my questions were cleared up.