From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753509AbYLRVrS (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Dec 2008 16:47:18 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751796AbYLRVrF (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Dec 2008 16:47:05 -0500 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:53026 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751790AbYLRVrD (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Dec 2008 16:47:03 -0500 Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 22:46:22 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Nick Piggin , venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com, tglx@linutronix.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org, hugh@veritas.com, arjan@infradead.org, jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org, rdreier@cisco.com, jeremy@goop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Suresh Siddha Subject: Re: [patch 4/7] x86 PAT: Implement track/untrack of pfnmap regions for x86 - v3 Message-ID: <20081218214622.GB30834@elte.hu> References: <20081218194126.963894000@intel.com> <20081218194617.533039000@intel.com> <20081218213806.GG10681@wotan.suse.de> <494AC358.6000103@zytor.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <494AC358.6000103@zytor.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Nick Piggin wrote: > > And that's the end of the mm/ code... yeah the mm/ parts seem OK to me, > > with my minor comments addressed I would ack them all. > > Great! > > Venki, can this be done with incremental patches, or would that be too > messy? would be nice to have them as deltas. The patches are pushed out into tip/master already - and we'll push it towards linux-next once Nick's concerns have been addressed. Ingo