From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu <eduard.munteanu@linux360.ro>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing/kmemtrace: normalize the raw tracer event to the unified tracing API
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 09:00:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081230080031.GB2455@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081229220937.GC5829@nowhere>
* Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> wrote:
> Pekka, note that I would be pleased to add statistical tracing on this
> tracer, but I would need a hashtable, or an array, or a list, or
> whatever iterable to insert the data into the stat tracing api.
there would be a couple of natural objects to group events by:
1) callsite [IP] of kmalloc()/kfree()/etc.
2) slab cache
3) slab object
for 1) callsite based histograms, i think ftrace should have a built-in
mechanism for that. kmemtrace tracepoints already pass in a call_site
argument that can be used to drive it.
for 2) slab cache based histograms (counts) - we need some knowledge about
the affected slab caches, and we need some space as well. The tracepoints
could be extended with a kmem_cache argument perhaps. A callback is needed
at cache creation time (which could be in the form of a tracepoint) that
gives kernel/tracing/kmemtrace.c the right place to allocate the per slab
histogram. (so that the other tracepoints dont have to do it implicitly -
which would be fragile as we are in the SLAB code, often with spinlocks
taken, so we cannot allocate)
i think 3) is the hardest so lets skip it for now ;-)
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-30 8:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-29 21:42 Frederic Weisbecker, Frederic Weisbecker
2008-12-29 21:46 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2008-12-29 22:09 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2008-12-29 22:13 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2008-12-30 7:49 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-12-30 8:01 ` Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu
2008-12-30 8:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-30 8:41 ` Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu
2008-12-30 8:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-30 9:01 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-12-30 9:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-30 14:16 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2008-12-30 15:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-30 21:09 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2008-12-30 14:32 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2008-12-30 8:00 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-12-30 7:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-30 7:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-05 16:48 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-01-05 23:50 ` Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081230080031.GB2455@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=eduard.munteanu@linux360.ro \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®