mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu <eduard.munteanu@linux360.ro>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing/kmemtrace: normalize the raw tracer event to the unified tracing API
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 09:00:31 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081230080031.GB2455@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081229220937.GC5829@nowhere>


* Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> wrote:

> Pekka, note that I would be pleased to add statistical tracing on this 
> tracer, but I would need a hashtable, or an array, or a list, or 
> whatever iterable to insert the data into the stat tracing api.

there would be a couple of natural objects to group events by:

	1) callsite [IP] of kmalloc()/kfree()/etc.

	2) slab cache

	3) slab object

for 1) callsite based histograms, i think ftrace should have a built-in 
mechanism for that. kmemtrace tracepoints already pass in a call_site 
argument that can be used to drive it.

for 2) slab cache based histograms (counts) - we need some knowledge about 
the affected slab caches, and we need some space as well. The tracepoints 
could be extended with a kmem_cache argument perhaps. A callback is needed 
at cache creation time (which could be in the form of a tracepoint) that 
gives kernel/tracing/kmemtrace.c the right place to allocate the per slab 
histogram. (so that the other tracepoints dont have to do it implicitly - 
which would be fragile as we are in the SLAB code, often with spinlocks 
taken, so we cannot allocate)

i think 3) is the hardest so lets skip it for now ;-)

	Ingo

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-12-30  8:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-12-29 21:42 Frederic Weisbecker, Frederic Weisbecker
2008-12-29 21:46 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2008-12-29 22:09 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2008-12-29 22:13   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2008-12-30  7:49   ` Pekka Enberg
2008-12-30  8:01     ` Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu
2008-12-30  8:16     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-30  8:41       ` Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu
2008-12-30  8:47         ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-30  9:01       ` Pekka Enberg
2008-12-30  9:11         ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-30 14:16       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2008-12-30 15:37         ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-30 21:09           ` Frederic Weisbecker
2008-12-30 14:32     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2008-12-30  8:00   ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-12-30  7:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-30  7:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-05 16:48   ` Steven Rostedt
2009-01-05 23:50     ` Frederic Weisbecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20081230080031.GB2455@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=eduard.munteanu@linux360.ro \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®