From: Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Subject: [BUG] 2.6.28-git LOCKDEP: Possible recursive rq->lock
Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 23:14:50 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090104174450.GB4301@dirshya.in.ibm.com> (raw)
Hi Ingo,
Kernbench runs on latest Linux git tree stalled with the following
lockdep warning.
Lockdep warning and lockup on Jan 3 Linus git tree
commit 7d3b56ba37a95f1f370f50258ed3954c304c524b
kernbench run with two threads stalled. sched_mc was zero.
x86_64 system with 8 logical CPUs in dual socket quad core
configuration.
I will post more information as I debug this warning/bug.
--Vaidy
kernel: =============================================
kernel: [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
kernel: 2.6.28-autotest-sv #1
kernel: ---------------------------------------------
kernel: autotest/6230 is trying to acquire lock:
kernel: (&rq->lock){++..}, at: [<ffffffff80229240>] task_rq_lock+0x44/0x7e
kernel:
kernel: but task is already holding lock:
kernel: (&rq->lock){++..}, at: [<ffffffff805d0fd4>] schedule+0x144/0x9d6
kernel:
kernel: other info that might help us debug this:
kernel: 1 lock held by autotest/6230:
kernel: #0: (&rq->lock){++..}, at: [<ffffffff805d0fd4>] schedule+0x144/0x9d6
kernel:
kernel: stack backtrace:
kernel: Pid: 6230, comm: autotest Not tainted 2.6.28-autotest-sv #1
kernel: Call Trace:
kernel: [<ffffffff802560d8>] __lock_acquire+0xe2a/0x15ed
kernel: [<ffffffff80256920>] lock_acquire+0x85/0xa9
kernel: [<ffffffff80229240>] task_rq_lock+0x44/0x7e
kernel: [<ffffffff805d3f4c>] _spin_lock+0x2d/0x5f
kernel: [<ffffffff80229240>] task_rq_lock+0x44/0x7e
kernel: [<ffffffff80229240>] task_rq_lock+0x44/0x7e
kernel: [<ffffffff8022de2e>] try_to_wake_up+0x83/0x26f
kernel: [<ffffffff805d0fd4>] schedule+0x144/0x9d6
kernel: [<ffffffff805d13e8>] schedule+0x558/0x9d6
kernel: [<ffffffff802549c8>] trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x120/0x14a
kernel: [<ffffffff8024a241>] hrtimer_start_range_ns+0x143/0x156
kernel: [<ffffffff805d2b82>] schedule_hrtimeout_range+0xcc/0xff
kernel: [<ffffffff80249ba0>] hrtimer_wakeup+0x0/0x22
kernel: [<ffffffff805d2b64>] schedule_hrtimeout_range+0xae/0xff
kernel: [<ffffffff802aa6e8>] do_select+0x502/0x55d
kernel: [<ffffffff802aa1e6>] do_select+0x0/0x55d
kernel: [<ffffffff802aac5f>] __pollwait+0x0/0xe5
kernel: [<ffffffff8022e01a>] default_wake_function+0x0/0x9
kernel: [<ffffffff8022e01a>] default_wake_function+0x0/0x9
kernel: [<ffffffff80256882>] __lock_acquire+0x15d4/0x15ed
last message repeated 2 times
kernel: [<ffffffff80252913>] lock_release_holdtime+0x1b/0x16c
kernel: [<ffffffff80252913>] lock_release_holdtime+0x1b/0x16c
kernel: [<ffffffff802aa774>] core_sys_select+0x31/0x2b0
kernel: [<ffffffff802aa92f>] core_sys_select+0x1ec/0x2b0
kernel: [<ffffffff802aa774>] core_sys_select+0x31/0x2b0
kernel: [<ffffffff8024785b>] remove_wait_queue+0x12/0x41
kernel: [<ffffffff80252913>] lock_release_holdtime+0x1b/0x16c
kernel: [<ffffffff805d3dc9>] _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3e/0x44
kernel: [<ffffffff802549c8>] trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x120/0x14a
kernel: [<ffffffff80237c6e>] do_wait+0x2a4/0x395
kernel: [<ffffffff8024cc09>] getnstimeofday+0x38/0x92
kernel: [<ffffffff802aac36>] sys_select+0x92/0xbb
kernel: [<ffffffff8020bedb>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
next reply other threads:[~2009-01-04 17:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-04 17:44 Vaidyanathan Srinivasan [this message]
2009-01-04 18:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-05 4:06 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-01-05 13:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-06 7:10 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-01-06 14:02 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-01-07 11:49 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-01-07 12:29 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-01-07 13:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-07 14:20 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-01-07 14:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-01-07 16:31 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-01-07 18:09 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-01-07 18:12 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090104174450.GB4301@dirshya.in.ibm.com \
--to=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®