From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754014AbZAFTBW (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jan 2009 14:01:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751651AbZAFTBN (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jan 2009 14:01:13 -0500 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:48126 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751470AbZAFTBM (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jan 2009 14:01:12 -0500 Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2009 11:01:14 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20090106.110114.103656110.davem@davemloft.net> To: rostedt@goodmis.org Cc: sam@ravnborg.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, srostedt@redhat.com, mingo@elte.hu, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: ftrace breaks sparc64 build From: David Miller In-Reply-To: References: <20090106.103234.163615537.davem@davemloft.net> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.1 on Emacs 22.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Steven Rostedt Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 13:52:36 -0500 (EST) > I would hate to black list archs just because it gives warnings. At the very least arch/sparc should build cleanly now because I took your ldc.c change