From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Cc: "Michał Mirosław" <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
bluesmoke-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.28 1/3] PCI-quirks: Unhide MCH5/6 memory controller configuration device
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 12:21:18 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200901061221.18512.jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200901061202.04321.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
On Tuesday, January 6, 2009 11:02 am Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Monday 05 January 2009 01:30:06 pm Michał Mirosław wrote:
> > Some BIOSes hide 'overflow' device (dev #6) for i82875P/PE chipsets.
> > The same happens for i82865P/PE. Add a quirk to enable this device.
> > This allows i82875 EDAC driver to bind to chipset's dev #6 and not
> > dev #0 as the latter is used by AGP driver.
> >
> > After testing this patch for couple of days on my laptop (i82856P)
> > it looks like something is resetting device 0 (MCH) config register
> > 0xF4 to zero and effectively disabling the device again. The delay
> > looks random to me.
>
> The BIOS left the device hidden. When you enable it with the quirk,
> the fact that it mysteriously gets disabled later seems like a pretty
> clear indication that something else we don't know about is using the
> device. Since there's no synchronization between the "something else"
> and the i82875p_edac.c driver, it seems like you're introducing the
> possibility for problems.
>
> I don't know anything about the EDAC driver. Is the value it provides
> really worth the possible problems with this approach? Maybe it is,
> but I don't want to be the one to debug a random interaction that
> causes a problem.
Yeah, there's some uncertainty there for sure so I've dropped the patch. If
it really provides a compelling feature we can always add it again with a
config option or runtime option to enable it.
--
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-06 20:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-23 21:50 [PATCH] pci-quirks: Unhide 'Overflow' device on i828{6,7}5P/PE chipsets Michał Mirosław
2008-12-23 23:35 ` Robert Hancock
2008-12-23 23:54 ` Michał Mirosław
2009-01-01 19:02 ` [PATCH 2.6.28 1/3] PCI-quirks: Unhide MCH5/6 memory controller configuration device Michał Mirosław
2009-01-01 19:05 ` [PATCH 2.6.28 2/3] EDAC: Use 'overflow' device for binding i82875 EDAC driver Michał Mirosław
2009-01-01 19:06 ` [PATCH 2.6.28 3/3] EDAC: Add support for i82865P/PE chipsets Michał Mirosław
2009-01-05 19:20 ` [PATCH 2.6.28 1/3] PCI-quirks: Unhide MCH5/6 memory controller configuration device Jesse Barnes
2009-01-05 20:28 ` Michał Mirosław
2009-01-05 20:30 ` Michał Mirosław
2009-01-05 21:02 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-01-06 19:02 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2009-01-06 20:21 ` Jesse Barnes [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200901061221.18512.jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--to=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=bjorn.helgaas@hp.com \
--cc=bluesmoke-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®