From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755242AbZAKVui (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Jan 2009 16:50:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752870AbZAKVu3 (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Jan 2009 16:50:29 -0500 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:53641 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751746AbZAKVu2 (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Jan 2009 16:50:28 -0500 Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 13:50:29 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20090111.135029.199678338.davem@davemloft.net> To: travis@sgi.com Cc: sfr@canb.auug.org.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, rusty@rustcorp.com.au Subject: Re: cpumask change causes sparc build bustage From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <496A232A.5070801@sgi.com> References: <20090111205008.db0a410e.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20090111.040640.188129980.davem@davemloft.net> <496A232A.5070801@sgi.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.1 on Emacs 22.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Mike Travis Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 08:49:46 -0800 > Thanks for fixing it. In actuality though, it should return cpu_mask_all > instead of CPU_MASK_ALL_PTR but that's a small nit. CPU_MASK_ALL_PTR is defined to &cpu_mask_all, that's why I used it, to be consistent with the other macro using CPU_MASK_ALL right above it.