From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754118AbZALIH5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jan 2009 03:07:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751467AbZALIHt (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jan 2009 03:07:49 -0500 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:39933 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751409AbZALIHs (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jan 2009 03:07:48 -0500 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Kamalesh Babulal Subject: Re: [BUG] 2.6.28-git-4 - powerpc - kernel expection 'c01 at .kernel_thread' Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 09:07:19 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.10.3 (Linux/2.6.28-rjw; KDE/4.1.3; x86_64; ; ) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, sfr@canb.auug.org.au, benh@kernel.crashing.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, mel@csn.ul.ie References: <20090102125752.GA5743@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <200901110108.20848.rjw@sisk.pl> <20090112072132.GA8409@linux.vnet.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <20090112072132.GA8409@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200901120907.20418.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday 12 January 2009, Kamalesh Babulal wrote: > * Rafael J. Wysocki [2009-01-11 01:08:19]: > > > On Friday 02 January 2009, Kamalesh Babulal wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > 2.6.28-git4 kernel drops to xmon with kernel expection. Similar kernel > > > expection was seen next-20081230 and next-20081231 and was reported > > > earlier at http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/12/31/157 > > > > Is this a regression from 2.6.27? > > > > Rafael > > > > This is not a regression from 2.6.27, this expection was first seen > next-20081230 patches and then was introduced into 2.6.28-git4 and is > reproducible with 2.6.28-rc1 kernel. Presumably you meant 2.6.29-rc1 ? In which case it would be a regression from 2.6.28 . Please confirm. Thanks, Rafael