From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1751290AbZALJcv@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1751290AbZALJcv (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 12 Jan 2009 04:32:51 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751788AbZALJcm
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Mon, 12 Jan 2009 04:32:42 -0500
Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:44379 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751462AbZALJcl (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 12 Jan 2009 04:32:41 -0500
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 10:32:14 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
       Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
       linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
       Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
       "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
       LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
       linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: origin tree build failure
Message-ID: <20090112093214.GA6798@elte.hu>
References: <20090112104837.69feedec.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <1231719015.22571.4.camel@pasglop> <20090112090552.GD26750@elte.hu> <20090112202427.3b918490.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20090112202427.3b918490.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean
X-ELTE-SpamScore: 1.0
X-ELTE-SpamLevel: s
X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no
X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 
X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=1.0 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_50 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3
	1.0 BAYES_50               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60%
	[score: 0.4956]
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


* Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:

> > It slipped through because it didnt get caught in build tests because 
> > cpufreq isnt enabled in the powerpc defconfig.
> 
> Which is one of the reasons we have linux-next: "integration testing".

Build bugs slipped through that net too in the past.

And we dont really want developers and maintainers to rely on an external 
middle man facility to be able to submit patches. So the best method is to 
make the defconfigs good enough to catch everyday build bugs. Random 
testing and linux-next can then catch the weird special cases as well.

	Ingo