From: Alex Buell <alex.buell@munted.org.uk>
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Fw: Online ext4 defragmention
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 12:46:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090112124636.3d2868f4@lithium.local.net> (raw)
On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 15:28:38 -0500, I waved a wand and this message
magically appears in front of Theodore Tso:
> On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 01:44:43PM +0000, Alex Buell wrote:
> > Can someone confirm if the online ext4 defragmentation ioctls will
> > be going into 2.6.29? Thanks, I'm planning a migration from a
> > disparate collection of filesystems to ext4 over the next few
> > months.
>
> Unfortunately, the defragmentation patches need to a lot of work (to
> be honest, largely refactored and almost rewritten) before they are
> ready to for mainline yes. I am also concerned that the current
> defrag patches also try too hard to keep blocks in the same block
> group, even as a higher priority keeping them non-fragmented.
So maybe 2.6.30? :-D
> Also, note that some of the benefits of ext4 only show up if you do a
> backup, mkfs, and restore; that's because there are layout changes
> that can only take place if you reformat the filesystem. Finally,
> there are some allocation algorithm changes which didn't make the
> 2.6.29 merge window which I think will make a long-term difference.
> So you'll probably want to use 2.6.29 with the ext4 patch set.
>
> So if you want the best performance and fastest fsck times (which I
> infer given your query about the defragmentation ioctls), you may want
> to consider doing a reformat and restore operation as part of your
> ext4 migration, at least for filesystem that you plan to use for
> active use. If the filesystem is just going to be an mp3 archive, for
> example, it might not be worth it to do the backup/reformat/restore
> path.
Having done 1) remounting ext3 volumes as ext4 and 2) backing up data
before reformatting as an ext4 volume, and restoring afterwards, and
noticed that with option 2 I got noticeable improvements in
performance.
Thank you for your advice, it seems reformatting is the best thing to
do.
--
http://www.munted.org.uk
Fearsome grindings.
--
http://www.munted.org.uk
Fearsome grindings.
reply other threads:[~2009-01-12 12:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090112124636.3d2868f4@lithium.local.net \
--to=alex.buell@munted.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®