From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757498AbZALWFf (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jan 2009 17:05:35 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752006AbZALWFV (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jan 2009 17:05:21 -0500 Received: from relay3.sgi.com ([192.48.171.31]:46112 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751045AbZALWFV (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jan 2009 17:05:21 -0500 Message-Id: <20090112220519.566749000@polaris-admin.engr.sgi.com> User-Agent: quilt/0.46-1 Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:05:19 -0800 From: Mike Travis To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Rusty Russell , Andrew Morton , Jack Steiner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 0/8] irq: update all archs to use new irq_desc cpumask_var_t's. Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Impact: cleanup, use new cpumask API. Minor cleanup to use the new affinity and pending_mask cpumask_var_t's in irq_desc: alpha irq: update alpha for new irq_desc arm irq: update arm for new irq_desc blackfin irq: update blackfin for new irq_desc ia64 irq: update ia64 for new irq_desc mips irq: update mips for new irq_desc parisc irq: update parisc for new irq_desc powerpc irq: update powerpc for new irq_desc arm irq: update arm for new irq_desc Ingo - should I push these to tip/cpus4096 via the cpus4096-for-ingo tree since that has the relevant changes to irq_desc? Or by some other means? Based on tip/cpus4096: v2.6.29-rc1-19-g92296c6 [I'm setting up the cross-compile toolchain and will verify (as much as I can) that the above builds correctly.] Signed-off-by: Mike Travis Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Cc: Paul Mackerras Cc: Bryan Wu Cc: David S. Miller Cc: Grant Grundler Cc: Kyle McMartin Cc: Matthew Wilcox Cc: Ralf Baechle Cc: Richard Henderson Cc: Tony Luck Cc: Cc: Cc: Cc: Cc: Cc: --