From: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
To: Stefan Assmann <sassmann@suse.de>
Cc: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
Olaf Dabrunz <od@suse.de>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
Sven Dietrich <sdietrich@novell.com>
Subject: Re: PCI, ACPI, IRQ, IOAPIC: reroute PCI interrupt to legacy boot interrupt equivalent
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:48:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200901140848.08531.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <496DB702.40302@suse.de>
On Wednesday 14 January 2009 02:57:22 am Stefan Assmann wrote:
> Shaohua Li wrote:
> > So a device can generate interrupt from two irqs. And we can get the irq
> > number for the routing table. Can we extend the irq mechanism and
> > automatically register the interrupt handler for the two irqs?
>
> This would not solve the problem of asserting 2 different interrupt
> lines, in the masked interrupt handling case, for 1 interrupt request.
> The result would be that the ISR is called twice and at the second call
> you can't be sure that the device hasn't already been serviced.
Calling the ISR twice isn't a problem, is it? We're talking about
PCI interrupts, which are shareable, so ISRs have to handle being
called extra times.
There's still the problem that the core will disable an IRQ if we
take it too many times without any ISR that cares about it. But that's
a core issue, not an ISR issue.
Bjorn
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-14 15:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-09 23:03 Len Brown
2009-01-12 11:09 ` Stefan Assmann
2009-01-12 11:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-12 18:51 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2009-01-12 19:25 ` Jon Masters
2009-01-12 19:45 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2009-01-13 13:32 ` Stefan Assmann
2009-01-13 18:22 ` Olaf Dabrunz
2009-01-15 15:34 ` Olaf Dabrunz
2009-01-12 23:36 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-01-13 0:29 ` Jon Masters
2009-01-13 1:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-13 3:47 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-01-13 4:26 ` Jon Masters
2009-01-14 11:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-14 19:18 ` Jon Masters
2009-01-14 22:42 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-01-14 22:53 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-01-14 22:56 ` Jon Masters
2009-01-15 12:36 ` Olaf Dabrunz
2009-01-15 10:16 ` Stefan Assmann
2009-01-13 11:18 ` Stefan Assmann
2009-01-13 15:57 ` Olaf Dabrunz
2009-01-15 0:10 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2009-01-15 14:08 ` Stefan Assmann
2009-01-13 8:25 ` Shaohua Li
2009-01-14 9:57 ` Stefan Assmann
2009-01-14 15:48 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2009-01-14 15:55 ` Olaf Dabrunz
2009-01-14 16:52 ` Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200901140848.08531.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com \
--to=bjorn.helgaas@hp.com \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=od@suse.de \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sassmann@suse.de \
--cc=sdietrich@novell.com \
--cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®