From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ftrace based hard lockup detector
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 14:04:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090119130442.GA6876@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0901190757330.17050@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
* Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Jan 2009, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>
> > Like the NMI watchdog, this feature try to detect hard lockups by
> > lurking at the non-progress of the timer interrupts.
> >
> > You can enable it at boot time by passing the ftrace_hardlockup parameter.
> > I plan to add a debugfs file to enable/disable at runtime.
> >
> > When a hardlockup is detected, it will print a backtrace. Perhaps it
> > would be good to print the locks held from lockdep too?
> >
> > It only support x86 for the moment, because a kind of generic timer interrupt
> > counter is needed on all archs to have it generic.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
>
> Hi Frederic,
>
> This seems like a rewrite of the NMI lockup code. In my debugging, I
> simply put ftrace_dump in the NMI lockup, which gives me a ftrace dump
> as soon as NMI detects a lockup. I'm a bit confused at what this gives
> us over that?
this is different from the NMI watchdog in a number of ways:
- it works on all platforms and in all situations where the NMI watchdog
does not work.
- in theory it can detect hard lockups in situations where the NMI
watchdog is disabled, such as suspend/resume or early bootup.
(especially early bootup lockups are nasty and the NMI watchdog is
enabled relatively late)
- it could be extended to detect 'soft' lockups too - i.e. we could have
a one-stop facility to detect all kinds of "kernel does not seem to
progress" lockups.
But it's not as complete as the NMI watchdog: it relies on instrumented
function calls rolling on and on during the lockup - that's not the case
when we get a hard lockup due to a tight, infinite loop somewhere.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-19 13:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <4973cff5.05a0660a.650c.2f54@mx.google.com>
2009-01-19 12:59 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-01-19 13:04 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-01-19 13:18 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-01-19 13:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-19 13:25 ` Frédéric Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090119130442.GA6876@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®