From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756111AbZAVMXW (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jan 2009 07:23:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753027AbZAVMXM (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jan 2009 07:23:12 -0500 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:59005 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752895AbZAVMXM (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jan 2009 07:23:12 -0500 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Jacek Luczak Subject: Re: [ACPI] GPE storm detected on FS Amilo Pro Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 13:22:41 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.10.3 (Linux/2.6.29-rc2-tst; KDE/4.1.3; x86_64; ; ) Cc: astarikovskiy@suse.de, len.brown@intel.com, LKML References: <4977352B.1040303@gmail.com> <200901211700.48357.rjw@sisk.pl> <497847D0.4050700@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <497847D0.4050700@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200901221322.41970.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 22 January 2009, Jacek Luczak wrote: > Hi Rafael, > > > So everything appears to be OK except that your hardware has a problem, > > which is correctly worked around and the message just tells you what happens. > > Most probably yes, but I'm using that kernel really shortly so there might be > some issues that I didn't noticed. This of course doesn't mean that here we have > bug, I was just bit confused with that message. > > >> NOTE: In git kernel I've noticed that after boot and obtaining IP from DHCP I've > >> got such message: > >> > >> Jan 21 14:44:32 difrost kernel: sky2 eth0: enabling interface > >> Jan 21 14:44:33 difrost kernel: sky2 eth0: Link is up at 100 Mbps, full duplex, > >> flow control rx > >> Jan 21 14:45:36 difrost kernel: ACPI: EC: missing confirmations, switch off > >> interrupt mode. > >> > >> This is not fully reproducible, didn't shown on [4]. > > > > This may be related to the issue behind the GPM storm message. > > Is it sth serious? I'm really lost here. No, I don't think it's serious. As long as everything works, there's not need to worry. :-) Thanks, Rafael