From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752718AbZAZQyc (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Jan 2009 11:54:32 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751575AbZAZQyX (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Jan 2009 11:54:23 -0500 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:53353 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751544AbZAZQyX (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Jan 2009 11:54:23 -0500 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [Linux 2.6.29-rc2] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:53:34 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.10.3 (Linux/2.6.29-rc2-tst; KDE/4.1.3; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Maciej Rutecki , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Andrew Morton , Thomas Gleixner References: <8db1092f0901170058k325dc6ddtddb42deea1ddd098@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200901261753.35416.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday 26 January 2009, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Sat, 17 Jan 2009, Maciej Rutecki wrote: > > > > During suspend to ram: > > [ 131.287012] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] > > code: suspend_to_ram./2958 > > [ 131.287012] caller is retrigger_next_event+0x13/0xb0 > > [ 131.287012] Pid: 2958, comm: suspend_to_ram. Not tainted 2.6.29-rc2 #1 > > [ 131.287012] Call Trace: > > [ 131.287012] [] debug_smp_processor_id+0xbf/0xd0 > > [ 131.287012] [] retrigger_next_event+0x13/0xb0 > > [ 131.287012] [] raw_notifier_call_chain+0x17/0x20 > > [ 131.287012] [] timekeeping_resume+0xe8/0x110 > > [ 131.287012] [] __sysdev_resume+0x11/0x50 > > [ 131.287012] [] sysdev_resume+0x47/0x80 > > [ 131.287012] [] device_power_up+0x8/0x10 > > Very scary. > > device_power_up() calls sysdev_resume _before_ it enables interrupts so it > sounds like something else has - very incorrectly - enabled interrupts too > early in your resume sequence. > > The patch that Andrew sent out and that apparently fixed things for you > should absolutely not have made any difference. This is suspend_enter(): > > arch_suspend_disable_irqs(); > BUG_ON(!irqs_disabled()); > > if ((error = device_power_down(PMSG_SUSPEND))) { > printk(KERN_ERR "PM: Some devices failed to power down\n"); > goto Done; > } > > if (!suspend_test(TEST_CORE)) > error = suspend_ops->enter(state); > > device_power_up(PMSG_RESUME); > Done: > arch_suspend_enable_irqs(); > > and notice how the whole thing is surrounded by that > arch_suspend_disable/enable_irqs(). > > So it looks like some sysdev driver (device_power_up does the sysdev > drivers first, so it can't be the regular low-level PCI drivers) is > enabling interrupts in its resume function. Scary and very wrong. > > It could easily be ACPI, of course. There was some other case where ACPI > did that, iirc. There is a known bug in the USB controllers' suspend that enables interrupts from within ->suspend_late(). It should be fixed by the next USB merge AFAICS. Thanks, Rafael