From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758532AbZBBVmY (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:42:24 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1759842AbZBBVl0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:41:26 -0500 Received: from liberdade.minaslivre.org ([72.232.18.203]:35461 "EHLO liberdade.minaslivre.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759830AbZBBVlZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:41:25 -0500 Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 19:41:53 -0200 From: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, containers@lists.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: cgroup mount point Message-ID: <20090202214153.GV3643@vespa.holoscopio.com> Mail-Followup-To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, containers@lists.linux-foundation.org References: <20090202200013.GU3643@vespa.holoscopio.com> <1233606371.15779.32.camel@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr> <20090202205246.GA28593@glandium.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="nYySOmuH/HDX6pKp" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090202205246.GA28593@glandium.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --nYySOmuH/HDX6pKp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 09:52:46PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 09:26:11PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > > On Mon, 2009-02-02 at 18:00 -0200, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote: > > > Hello, > > >=20 > > > Some software I intend to package work with the new cgroup feature in > > > Linux. I would like to open a discussion about what would be the bett= er > > > place to mount it and how/when to mount it. > >=20 > > What do other distros use? >=20 > Even better: what do the kernel folks want to do? >=20 > Mike =46rom what I've seen, most of them are in the same phases as Debian, or, perhaps, behind. Fedora seems to plan that for Fedora 11, and they have some support in libvirt. Linux Documentation is not consistent and have some funny options. In Documentation/cgroups/*, we have: cgroups.txt: /dev/cgroup cpuacct.txt: /cgroups devices.txt: /cgroups memcg_test.txt: /opt/cgroup /opt/cpuset /cgroup memory.txt: /cgroups cpusets.txt: /dev/cpuset freezer-subsystem.txt: /containers There is also: Documentation/scheduler/sched-design-CFS.txt: /dev/cpuctl /cgroup Documentation/scheduler/sched-rt-group.txt: /cgroup Documentation/accounting/cgroupstats.txt: /cgroup So, we have some more options now: /cgroups, /containers, /dev/cpuset, /dev/cpuctl, /opt/cgroup, /opt/cpuset. I am copying the container and the kernel guys. Perhaps, we can find an agreement (if we want to find one at all) and change all that Documentation to get consistent. Regards, Cascardo. --nYySOmuH/HDX6pKp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkmHaKEACgkQyTpryRcqtS0sqwCcDigmXRoVTC5Rwq6+O83uHA3O uP0An0TonymKQRNhtkBM+GxYaIPkHPR0 =VqDr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nYySOmuH/HDX6pKp--