From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754594AbZBCM5b (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Feb 2009 07:57:31 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751747AbZBCM5W (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Feb 2009 07:57:22 -0500 Received: from liberdade.minaslivre.org ([72.232.18.203]:49899 "EHLO liberdade.minaslivre.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751467AbZBCM5W (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Feb 2009 07:57:22 -0500 Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 10:57:45 -0200 From: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo To: Ben Finney Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, containers@lists.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: cgroup mount point Message-ID: <20090203125744.GC3788@vespa.holoscopio.com> Mail-Followup-To: Ben Finney , debian-devel@lists.debian.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, containers@lists.linux-foundation.org References: <20090202200013.GU3643@vespa.holoscopio.com> <1233606371.15779.32.camel@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr> <20090202205246.GA28593@glandium.org> <20090202214153.GV3643@vespa.holoscopio.com> <20090203102416.GA8886@redhat.com> <87ljsnzo4v.fsf@benfinney.id.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="da4uJneut+ArUgXk" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87ljsnzo4v.fsf@benfinney.id.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --da4uJneut+ArUgXk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 11:44:00PM +1100, Ben Finney wrote: > "Daniel P. Berrange" writes: >=20 > > On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 07:41:53PM -0200, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo= wrote: > > > So, we have some more options now: /cgroups, /containers, > > > /dev/cpuset, /dev/cpuctl, /opt/cgroup, /opt/cpuset. > >=20 > > Putting new mount points in / is not really acceptable, so that rules > > out the first two. /opt is just totally wrong, since that is intended > > for add on software packages. /dev/ feels a little odd, since it is > > not really device nodes >=20 > I agree with all that Thadeu Lima says here. I would add that cgroups > are nothing to do with device nodes, so definitely don't belong in > =E2=80=98/dev/=E2=80=99 either. The message you quoted is from Daniel Berrange, not me. Could you also tell your rationale for not agreeing with /? Regards, Cascardo. > Since they're a filesystem mapping =E2=80=9Cfor browsing and manipulation > from user space=E2=80=9D of a kernel facility, I think =E2=80=98/sys/cgro= ups/=E2=80=99 is > appropriate. >=20 > --=20 > \ =E2=80=9CIt's my belief we developed language because of our deep = inner | > `\ need to complain.=E2=80=9D =E2=80=94Jane Wagner, vi= a Lily Tomlin | > _o__) | > Ben Finney --da4uJneut+ArUgXk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkmIP0gACgkQyTpryRcqtS0gfwCeNESvcsbtrnHDydfihDHfsyXV 1F0AnjoRLwCaSYBnpRh9BIJFhQn2EJMd =w/XP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --da4uJneut+ArUgXk--