From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754031AbZBCLvc (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Feb 2009 06:51:32 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752163AbZBCLvX (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Feb 2009 06:51:23 -0500 Received: from smtp113.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([209.191.84.66]:43117 "HELO smtp113.mail.mud.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752156AbZBCLvX (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Feb 2009 06:51:23 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com.au; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:From:To:Subject:Date:User-Agent:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Disposition:Message-Id; b=k3MDWxDjfAJB3Qm1ufCEei1A2DLa5xwIOr1f4tmP5LyCZpCPAsabN0qrIrSrSjFHrjy3UUzIm9Rxlu2ZTbyAVQBDobG2E7nV5gGpOfBLPUYzzeuwsB2jWxQ45usBqIKt8fgPXlI4I8Odh3g4BFJ1Kwy+yHMlgkEQt8H9Ly4OzfI= ; X-YMail-OSG: 8hoZVhAVM1kdSUbBxmCpe2Zo9ZM8SfO70GheRT1zgt7FouCinAqaBwsjcb_75GxyJ9yKI6mfszak4mi1jSztpK7xBMprH1w4oE5rDZScfkM9qixknS70GuU5qU7NPgfQR4p0QbZDguX9QouA6DhONMdcAm8BfM9qQQtUhbaS_U20ipVD0g5PYbsstPbrvw-- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 From: Nick Piggin To: Mel Gorman Subject: Re: [patch] SLQB slab allocator (try 2) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 22:50:54 +1100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.51 (KDE/4.0.4; ; ) Cc: Pekka Enberg , Nick Piggin , Linux Memory Management List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Andrew Morton , Lin Ming , "Zhang, Yanmin" , Christoph Lameter References: <20090123154653.GA14517@wotan.suse.de> <200902032136.26022.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> <20090203112852.GJ9840@csn.ul.ie> In-Reply-To: <20090203112852.GJ9840@csn.ul.ie> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200902032250.55968.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 03 February 2009 22:28:52 Mel Gorman wrote: > On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 09:36:24PM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote: > > I'd be interested to see how slub performs if booted with > > slub_min_objects=1 (which should give similar order pages to SLAB and > > SLQB). > > Just to clarify on this last point, do you mean slub_max_order=0 to > force order-0 allocations in SLUB? Hmm... I think slub_min_objects=1 should also do basically the same. Actually slub_min_object=1 and slub_max_order=1 should get closest I think.