From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753968AbZBHWm7 (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Feb 2009 17:42:59 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751319AbZBHWmv (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Feb 2009 17:42:51 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:44818 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751221AbZBHWmu (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Feb 2009 17:42:50 -0500 Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 17:42:49 -0500 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Alessandro Bono Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-kernel , linux-xfs Subject: Re: XFS kernel BUG at fs/buffer.c:470! with 2.6.28.4 Message-ID: <20090208224249.GA11931@infradead.org> References: <1234011974.7435.11.camel@champagne.cantina> <20090208222859.GA2532@infradead.org> <1234132752.12370.0.camel@champagne.cantina> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1234132752.12370.0.camel@champagne.cantina> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 11:39:12PM +0100, Alessandro Bono wrote: > On Sun, 2009-02-08 at 17:28 -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 07, 2009 at 02:06:13PM +0100, Alessandro Bono wrote: > > > Feb 7 12:43:12 champagne kernel: [ 5828.167041] ------------[ cut > > > here ]------------ > > > Feb 7 12:43:12 champagne kernel: [ 5828.167048] kernel BUG at > > > fs/buffer.c:470! > > > > Per > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/hpa/linux-2.6-allstable.git;a=blob;f=fs/buffer.c;h=665d446b25bc034241ef54c3c6b1d239c0ccf0f9;hb=d5b562330ec766292a3ac54ae5e0673610bd5b3d > > > > line 470 in fs/buffer.c of 2.6.28.4 has a comment and no actual code. > > > > What additional patches do you have applied? > > > > vanilla kernel > no additional patches at all Well, the 2.6.28.4 clearly doesn't have a bug there. Can you attach the fs/buffer.c you built the kernel from?