Re: [PATCHv2] lis3lv02d: support both one- and two-byte sensors

[Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>]

On Wed 2009-02-11 01:21:32, Giuseppe Bilotta wrote:
> [removed git from the cc because that was a mistake]
> 
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 12:54 AM, Éric Piel <Eric.Piel@tremplin-utc.net> wrote:
> > BTW, now that this is working. Could you double check the correct axes set
> > up. In particular, is it x_inverted or y_inverted, and what about z axis...
> 
> Now that we have the 8 vs 16 bit mess sorted out, I re-checked and
> there my sensor definitely has the X (first) axis inverted, so the
> one-liner patch I sent at the beginning is still valid, at least as
> far as my laptop is involved. It might be that different dv5 Pavilions
> have different sensors though, which will make it quite harder to sort
> out.
> 
> I'd be interested in hearing from the other user (the one reporting
> inverted Y): rather than checking neverball, could he use plain jstest
> and see if the results match the Documentation or not?

Actuall 'watch cat position' is simplest way to test it.
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html