From: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
To: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: oleg@redhat.com, ebiederm@xmission.com, bastian@waldi.eu.org,
daniel@hozac.com, xemul@openvz.org, containers@lists.osdl.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7][v7] Container-init signal semantics
Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2009 20:04:53 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090209040453.9CBB0FC330@magilla.sf.frob.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Sukadev Bhattiprolu's message of Saturday, 7 February 2009 13:20:22 -0800 <20090207212022.GA25353@us.ibm.com>
> Any comments on this patchset ? We are not sure about patch 7, but should
> I send the rest to Andrew ?
I think they are fine now if Oleg doesn't see any problems. The /proc
change in patch 7 is a matter of taste and I just don't care either way.
Thanks,
Roland
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-09 4:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-17 20:26 Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2009-01-17 20:35 ` [PATCH 1/7][v7] Remove 'handler' parameter to tracehook functions Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2009-01-17 20:35 ` [PATCH 2/7][v7] Protect init from unwanted signals more Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2009-01-17 20:35 ` [PATCH 3/7][v7] Add from_ancestor_ns parameter to send_signal() Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2009-01-17 20:36 ` [PATCH 4/7][v7] Protect cinit from unblocked SIG_DFL signals Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2009-01-17 22:12 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-01-20 1:07 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2009-01-20 1:09 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2009-01-17 20:36 ` [PATCH 5/7][v7] Protect cinit from blocked fatal signals Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2009-01-17 20:37 ` [PATCH 6/7][v7] SI_USER: Masquerade si_pid when crossing pid ns boundary Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2009-01-17 20:37 ` [PATCH 7/7][v7] proc: Show SIG_DFL signals to init as "ignored" signals Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2009-01-17 22:19 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-01-20 1:04 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2009-01-20 7:33 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-01-20 16:09 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2009-01-19 2:09 ` [PATCH 0/7][v7] Container-init signal semantics KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-01-21 3:05 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2009-01-21 3:53 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-01-21 4:16 ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-01-21 4:23 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-01-21 4:05 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2009-01-22 5:48 ` Matt Helsley
2009-01-21 4:39 ` Bryan Donlan
2009-01-21 8:31 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-02-07 21:20 ` Sukadev Bhattiprolu
2009-02-09 4:04 ` Roland McGrath [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090209040453.9CBB0FC330@magilla.sf.frob.com \
--to=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=bastian@waldi.eu.org \
--cc=containers@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=daniel@hozac.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=xemul@openvz.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®