From: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>
To: stable@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: [PATCH][stable-28] x86: microcode_amd: fix wrong handling of equivalent CPU id
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 11:32:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090209103230.GB6041@alberich.amd.com> (raw)
Impact: fix bug resulting in non-loaded AMD microcode
mc_header->processor_rev_id is a 2 byte value. Similar is true for
equiv_cpu in an equiv_cpu_entry -- only 2 bytes are of interest.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 23 ++++++-----------------
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
This fix is already upstream.
See
commit 3c763fd77e66e55d029052da31df0abd9920cb1e
(x86: microcode_amd: fix wrong handling of equivalent CPU id)
Please apply to stable-28.
Thanks,
Andreas
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c
index 5f8e5d7..b5bc814 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ struct microcode_header_amd {
unsigned int mc_patch_data_checksum;
unsigned int nb_dev_id;
unsigned int sb_dev_id;
- unsigned char processor_rev_id[2];
+ u16 processor_rev_id;
unsigned char nb_rev_id;
unsigned char sb_rev_id;
unsigned char bios_api_rev;
@@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ static int get_matching_microcode(int cpu, void *mc, int rev)
while (equiv_cpu_table[i].installed_cpu != 0) {
if (current_cpu_id == equiv_cpu_table[i].installed_cpu) {
- equiv_cpu_id = equiv_cpu_table[i].equiv_cpu;
+ equiv_cpu_id = equiv_cpu_table[i].equiv_cpu & 0xffff;
break;
}
i++;
@@ -137,21 +137,10 @@ static int get_matching_microcode(int cpu, void *mc, int rev)
return 0;
}
- if ((mc_header->processor_rev_id[0]) != (equiv_cpu_id & 0xff)) {
- printk(KERN_ERR
- "microcode: CPU%d patch does not match "
- "(patch is %x, cpu extended is %x) \n",
- cpu, mc_header->processor_rev_id[0],
- (equiv_cpu_id & 0xff));
- return 0;
- }
-
- if ((mc_header->processor_rev_id[1]) != ((equiv_cpu_id >> 16) & 0xff)) {
- printk(KERN_ERR "microcode: CPU%d patch does not match "
- "(patch is %x, cpu base id is %x) \n",
- cpu, mc_header->processor_rev_id[1],
- ((equiv_cpu_id >> 16) & 0xff));
-
+ if (mc_header->processor_rev_id != equiv_cpu_id) {
+ printk(KERN_ERR "microcode: CPU%d patch does not match "
+ "(processor_rev_id: %x, eqiv_cpu_id: %x)\n",
+ cpu, mc_header->processor_rev_id, equiv_cpu_id);
return 0;
}
--
1.6.0.4
next reply other threads:[~2009-02-09 10:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-09 10:32 Andreas Herrmann [this message]
2009-02-09 10:45 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090209103230.GB6041@alberich.amd.com \
--to=andreas.herrmann3@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®