From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753913AbZBILTv (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Feb 2009 06:19:51 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755050AbZBILTg (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Feb 2009 06:19:36 -0500 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:55614 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755009AbZBILTf (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Feb 2009 06:19:35 -0500 Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 11:19:22 +0000 From: Russell King - ARM Linux To: Paul Walmsley Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: [PATCH C 06/13] OMAP3 clock: DPLLs should enter bypass if new rate is sys_ck Message-ID: <20090209111922.GA11668@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20090128190724.12092.22239.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <20090128190823.12092.2638.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <20090129123936.GA16644@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 10:47:40PM -0700, Paul Walmsley wrote: > Hello Russell, > > this E-mail responds to your comments on patches C 04 through C 08. > My understanding is that you'd like me to: > > 1. Compress patches C 04 through C 09; What I would like to see is a clear set of patches (or maybe just a single patch if appropriate) implementing the bypass DPLL support, and have it implemented in a common form for both OMAP2 and OMAP3. In other words, if we're going to have a 'bypass' clock in the DPLL data, it shouldn't be just an OMAP3 thing. I suspect it's going to be easier for me to figure out what's going on, clean up the existing patches and work from them so that they still fit in the existing series.