From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Federico Cuello <fedux@lugmen.org.ar>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] write-back: fix break condition
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 01:34:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090210003452.GA26143@wotan.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090209152140.aa3f50aa.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 03:21:40PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> Thanks, but please do cc the people who were involved with a patch when
> you find a problem with it!
>
> On Sat, 7 Feb 2009 01:33:30 -0200
> Federico Cuello <fedux@lugmen.org.ar> wrote:
>
> > Commit 673353723e7a6550625fb719059c5f31cfaecd18 fixed nr_to_write
> > counter, but didn't set the break condition properly.
>
> It's actually commit dcf6a79dda5cc2a2bec183e50d829030c0972aaa
> ("write-back: fix nr_to_write counter").
>
> > If nr_to_write == 0 after being decremented it will loop one more time
> > before setting done = 1 and breaking the loop.
>
> We prefer that patches include the author's Signed-off-by:, as per
> Documentation/SubmittingPatches, please.
>
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c
> > index bb5fa2b..9e2ae50 100644
> > --- a/mm/page-writeback.c
> > +++ b/mm/page-writeback.c
> > @@ -981,20 +981,21 @@ continue_unlock:
> > }
> > }
> >
> > - if (nr_to_write > 0)
> > + if (nr_to_write > 0) {
> > nr_to_write--;
> > - else if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) {
> > - /*
> > - * We stop writing back only if we are not
> > - * doing integrity sync. In case of integrity
> > - * sync we have to keep going because someone
> > - * may be concurrently dirtying pages, and we
> > - * might have synced a lot of newly appeared
> > - * dirty pages, but have not synced all of the
> > - * old dirty pages.
> > - */
> > - done = 1;
> > - break;
> > + if (nr_to_write == 0 && wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) {
> > + /*
> > + * We stop writing back only if we are not
> > + * doing integrity sync. In case of integrity
> > + * sync we have to keep going because someone
> > + * may be concurrently dirtying pages, and we
> > + * might have synced a lot of newly appeared
> > + * dirty pages, but have not synced all of the
> > + * old dirty pages.
> > + */
> > + done = 1;
> > + break;
> > + }
> > }
> >
> > if (wbc->nonblocking && bdi_write_congested(bdi)) {
>
> Artem, Nick, please check?
Yes, this looks OK by me.
Acked-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-10 0:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-07 3:33 Federico Cuello
2009-02-09 23:21 ` Andrew Morton
2009-02-10 0:34 ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2009-02-10 6:22 ` Damien Wyart
2009-02-10 7:47 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2009-02-10 7:46 ` Artem Bityutskiy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090210003452.GA26143@wotan.suse.de \
--to=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fedux@lugmen.org.ar \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®