From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761314AbZBLWTV (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Feb 2009 17:19:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758202AbZBLWTM (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Feb 2009 17:19:12 -0500 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:37995 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756713AbZBLWTL (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Feb 2009 17:19:11 -0500 Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 14:19:05 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20090212.141905.48656767.davem@davemloft.net> To: airlied@gmail.com Cc: airlied@linux.ie, benh@kernel.crashing.org, dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5]: ATI/RADEON DRM bug fixes... From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <21d7e9970902120326j2ce300d9x7df5a870c69a95f5@mail.gmail.com> References: <20090212.021522.217840575.davem@davemloft.net> <21d7e9970902120326j2ce300d9x7df5a870c69a95f5@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.1 on Emacs 22.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Dave Airlie Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 21:26:51 +1000 > On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 8:15 PM, David Miller wrote: > > > > David, this work is against your drm-next branch. > > > > Here are a collection of bug fixes for the Radeon DRM support. Most > > of them have to do with trying to access kernel virtual addresses > > using DRM_READ32() and DRM_WRITE32(). > > > > With these patches at least the writeback test works on sparc64 and > > the CP is able to process commands in the ring. I'm now diagnosing > > some further problem that's preventing Xorg from functioning fully but > > I should be able to diagnose that soon. > > > > You'll probably love patch #4 in this series, and it probably explains > > all kinds of weird problems people run into with DRM on radeon cards. > > Thanks Dave, > > These all look great, the EMITED one has potential to regress > something by fixing it, > but I think it might actually make things better, I'll push all of > these to Linus asap as > they all fix real bugs. I've put them into my drm-fixes branch and I'll try and > re-review and get some testing tomorrow when I'm more awake. Note that these depend upon Ben's drm_addmap and resource fixed in your drm-next branch, sparc64 was also broken by those problems.