From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760081AbZBMVP5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Feb 2009 16:15:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753117AbZBMVPt (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Feb 2009 16:15:49 -0500 Received: from outbound-mail-305.bluehost.com ([67.222.53.251]:33219 "HELO outbound-mail-305.bluehost.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1753010AbZBMVPs (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Feb 2009 16:15:48 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=virtuousgeek.org; h=Received:From:To:Subject:Date:User-Agent:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Disposition:Message-Id:X-Identified-User; b=RIUqzNlWKHzy0v4JI6JBj1wOu5ClNBw0Qm6by8VVzYgsvJWhDtCpKEk1TU1mFgkTr/RaPNARbPuk1p6DNamw+XU1aq98LQqCx0oc+NXhEND1oyCwSK/zhuMUmM3SP+7w; From: Jesse Barnes To: Alex Chiang Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: enhance physical slot debug information Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 13:15:46 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 Cc: Andrew Patterson , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, "linux-kernel" References: <20090204182522.GA22419@ldl.fc.hp.com> In-Reply-To: <20090204182522.GA22419@ldl.fc.hp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200902131315.46982.jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> X-Identified-User: {642:box128.bluehost.com:virtuous:virtuousgeek.org} {sentby:smtp auth 75.111.27.49 authed with jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org} Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday, February 4, 2009 10:25 am Alex Chiang wrote: > Convert usages of pr_debug to dev_dbg and add physical slot name. > > Note that we use dev_dbg on the struct pci_bus and still manually > print out the PCI slot number (instead of calling dev_dbg on a > pci_dev) because a struct pci_bus with empty physical slots will > not have any pci_devs. > > Reviewed-by: Andrew Patterson > Signed-off-by: Alex Chiang > --- > Jesse, since this is all under #ifdef DEBUG, it's your call > whether you want to queue it for .29 or .30. Doesn't matter much > to us either way, thanks. Just applied this to my linux-next branch. Thanks. -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center