From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1753505AbZBOOhp@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753505AbZBOOhp (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Sun, 15 Feb 2009 09:37:45 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751372AbZBOOhg
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Sun, 15 Feb 2009 09:37:36 -0500
Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:46864 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751229AbZBOOhg (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sun, 15 Feb 2009 09:37:36 -0500
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
Subject: Re: [Bug #12705] X200: Brightness broken since 2.6.29-rc4-58-g4c098bc
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 15:37:04 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.11.0 (Linux/2.6.29-rc5-tst; KDE/4.2.0; x86_64; ; )
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
       Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org>,
       Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
       Nico Schottelius <nico-linux-20090213@schottelius.org>,
       eric.anholt@intel.com
References: <juADNmcceYF.A.mdD.Mr0lJB@chimera> <rjPbZ5GRJPO.A.htD.Sr0lJB@chimera> <20090215134347.GB21670@srcf.ucam.org>
In-Reply-To: <20090215134347.GB21670@srcf.ucam.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200902151537.05739.rjw@sisk.pl>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Sunday 15 February 2009, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 09:38:23PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> 
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.28.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> 
> I think Eric sent a test patch for this. Did that get pushed?

I haven't found it.

Rafael