From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Manish Katiyar <mkatiyar@gmail.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove errors caught by checkpatch.pl in kernel/signal.c
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 21:08:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090215200850.GA28011@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ea11fea30902151107i5fbc523ejcbe9044c6f4bc20d@mail.gmail.com>
* Manish Katiyar <mkatiyar@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Below patch removes some errors generated by checkpatch.pl in
> kernel/signal.c. Caught by Ingo's code-quality script.
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Manish Katiyar <mkatiyar@gmail.com>
> ---
> kernel/signal.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
> 1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
Note, your patch has line-wrap problems, such as:
> +++ b/kernel/signal.c
> @@ -89,20 +89,20 @@ static inline int has_pending_signals(sigset_t
> *signal, sigset_t *blocked)
> switch (_NSIG_WORDS) {
Causing:
patch: **** malformed patch at line 23: *signal, sigset_t *blocked)
See Documentation/email-clients.txt.
Also, kernel/signal.c needs a thorough cleanup, and your patch only
handles about a third of the errors+warnings:
before: total: 61 errors, 28 warnings, 3 checks, 2615 lines checked
after: total: 30 errors, 24 warnings, 3 checks, 2614 lines checked
If then it's best to bring the count down very close to zero (so
that only the obvious checkpatch false positives are left), and also
have a really good human-coder look at signal.c's:
- structure and code flow
- variable naming
- include files section
- general splitup and function ordering
- comment style consistency
etc. - to turn it into a really modern, nice-to-look-at and hackable
Linux kernel file.
The checkpatch motivated cleanups really only tell us half of the
story that is usually in such a long-forgotten file - and by fixing
the checkpatch warnings only it gives us a false impression of
cleanliness. So the checkpatch fixes should go hand in hand with
more grounds-up cleanups. (which can all still stay at the pure
style level, so that the .o output does not change - for easy
verification.)
Ingo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-15 20:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-15 19:07 Manish Katiyar
2009-02-15 20:08 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090215200850.GA28011@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mkatiyar@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome