From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755523AbZBOXNW (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Feb 2009 18:13:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753651AbZBOXNL (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Feb 2009 18:13:11 -0500 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:48521 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753601AbZBOXNJ (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Feb 2009 18:13:09 -0500 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [Bug #12263] Sata soft reset filling log Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 00:12:56 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.0 (Linux/2.6.29-rc5-tst; KDE/4.2.0; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Justin Madru , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , Linux IDE , Alan Cox , Hugh Dickins , Larry Finger , Mikael Pettersson , Sergei Shtylyov References: <200902152221.43834.rjw@sisk.pl> <20090215223045.GC29300@elte.hu> In-Reply-To: <20090215223045.GC29300@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200902160012.57584.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sunday 15 February 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > On Sunday 15 February 2009, Justin Madru wrote: > > > Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > > > of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28. > > > > > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > > > introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should > > > > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > > > > > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12263 > > > > Subject : Sata soft reset filling log > > > > Submitter : Justin Madru > > > > Date : 2008-12-13 2:07 (64 days old) > > > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122913412608533&w=4 > > > > > > I'm still seeing this on .29-rc5, and I think that my bug #12263 is a > > > duplicate of bug #12609, > > > or more correctly it's a duplicate of mine because I reported first. > > > > > > It seems like the bug has been fixed in tip/master for some time now. > > > Below is the diff of origin and tip from when I tested. > > > > Ingo, do you know whinch patch in -tip fixes this regression? > > This one, done on Jan 10, more than a month ago: > > f1d26da: Revert "libata: Add 32bit PIO support" > > When a commit causes trouble in -tip qa i immediately revert it in 95% > of the cases, no questions asked. Especially if it's related to > persistent storage. OK, thanks. We seem to have a working fix patch for this issue in bug #12609. Best, Rafael