From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: fubar@us.ibm.com
Cc: brian.haley@hp.com, arvidjaar@mail.ru, jamagallon@ono.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
rjw@sisk.pl, bonding-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bonding-devel] 2.6.29 regression? Bonding tied to IPV6 in 29-rc5
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:54:24 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090217.145424.49927834.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <16929.1234904788@death.nxdomain.ibm.com>
From: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 13:06:28 -0800
> Putting the ipv6 bits into a different module might not help,
> either, because the "core" bonding code would still have the call to the
> ipv6 functions. Unless there's some magic way to somehow know at
> runtime whether or not the ipv6 module is loaded, and only try to
> resolve those symbols if ipv6 is loaded. That seems complicated.
This is a non-starter, as I described in one of my other replies.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-17 22:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-13 22:20 Linux v2.6.29-rc5 Linus Torvalds
2009-02-17 8:52 ` Bonding tied to IPV6 in 29-rc5 J.A. Magallón
2009-02-17 17:01 ` 2.6.29 regression? " Andrey Borzenkov
2009-02-17 18:17 ` Andrey Borzenkov
2009-02-17 20:08 ` [Bonding-devel] " Jay Vosburgh
2009-02-17 22:49 ` David Miller
2009-02-17 20:10 ` Brian Haley
2009-02-17 20:56 ` Thomas Backlund
2009-02-17 21:06 ` [Bonding-devel] " Jay Vosburgh
2009-02-17 21:49 ` Brian Haley
2009-02-17 22:18 ` J.A. Magallón
2009-02-17 22:24 ` Jay Vosburgh
2009-03-04 11:46 ` Jan Engelhardt
2009-02-17 22:30 ` Nicolas de Pesloüan
2009-02-17 22:54 ` David Miller [this message]
2009-02-17 22:51 ` David Miller
2009-02-17 22:29 ` David Miller
2009-02-18 4:41 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2009-02-18 5:29 ` David Miller
2009-02-18 5:55 ` Roland Dreier
2009-02-18 13:55 ` Theodore Tso
2009-02-18 16:24 ` Chuck Lever
2009-02-18 18:33 ` Vlad Yasevich
2009-02-18 19:57 ` Brian Haley
2009-02-18 21:21 ` John Dykstra
2009-02-18 21:29 ` [Bonding-devel] " Stephen Hemminger
2009-02-19 13:32 ` Herbert Xu
2009-02-18 22:14 ` David Miller
2009-02-19 1:11 ` Vlad Yasevich
2009-02-19 13:29 ` Herbert Xu
2009-02-18 6:55 ` Frank Blaschka
2009-02-19 18:15 ` Randy Dunlap
2009-02-19 18:19 ` Andrey Borzenkov
2009-02-19 18:20 ` Jay Vosburgh
2009-03-04 6:05 ` Jan Engelhardt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090217.145424.49927834.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=arvidjaar@mail.ru \
--cc=bonding-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=brian.haley@hp.com \
--cc=fubar@us.ibm.com \
--cc=jamagallon@ono.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®