From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753658AbZBQOQK (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Feb 2009 09:16:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751627AbZBQOPy (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Feb 2009 09:15:54 -0500 Received: from smtp-out.google.com ([216.239.45.13]:23636 "EHLO smtp-out.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751680AbZBQOPx (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Feb 2009 09:15:53 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=beta; d=google.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:organization: user-agent:x-system-of-record; b=NaZwo0GTuWAKfGtJdYMUcWWkPApTRYQjdCLznfmjwyW8EMmnfh9S+n1n1ZDcBW2b8 Z+N1uXrIg/Frx7ftowfAA== Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 06:14:34 -0800 From: Brian Swetland To: Matthew Garrett Cc: Pavel Machek , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , pm list , LKML , Arve Hj?nnev?g , Alan Stern , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Nigel Cunningham , mark gross , "Woodruff, Richard" , Uli Luckas , Igor Stoppa , Len Brown Subject: Re: [RFD] Automatic suspend Message-ID: <20090217141434.GA12378@bulgaria.corp.google.com> References: <200902160010.16955.rjw@sisk.pl> <20090216225831.GH1370@ucw.cz> <20090216231324.GA15435@srcf.ucam.org> <20090216232259.GK1370@ucw.cz> <20090216232619.GB15678@srcf.ucam.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090216232619.GB15678@srcf.ucam.org> Organization: Google, Inc. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15+20070412 (2007-04-11) X-System-Of-Record: true Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org [Matthew Garrett ] > On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 12:22:59AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > > On Mon 2009-02-16 23:13:24, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > > Meanwhile, on embedded it's becoming a less interesting problem because > > > idle and suspended are often now equivalent states. > > > > Android people tell us otherwise. > > https://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/linux-pm/2009-January/019493.html > says that they're the same on their current platform. Well on the Qualcomm MSM72xx SoCs, yeah they're pretty similar -- we can reasonably enter power collapse (full shutdown of the ARM11 and peripherals) from idle. But this is not (to my knowledge) true of *all* SoCs out there. Also, resuming from this state can take 5-30ms (depending on how distracted the baseband processor is by what's going on on the network). Brian