From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] [git pull] tip updates for 2.6.29
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 10:19:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090219091943.GB2354@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090219033531.360862326@goodmis.org>
* Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
> Ingo,
>
> I found the cause of the hard lock up you were seeing. It is one
> of those cases where a new patch does not create a bug, but unveils
> one. The change that showed the bug was:
>
> e68746a: ftrace: enable filtering only when a function is filtered on
>
> The bug was there all along, but his change revealed it. There were
> two bugs actually.
>
> 1) The function tracer is useless without KALLSYMS. Without KALLSYMS
> you will only get hex values for your funtion traces.
> This also totally breaks the dynamic function tracer. It depends
> on having names to compare to select functions.
>
> 2) In the self test, there is a while loop that consumes the buffer
> and will not end until the buffer is empty. If we still have a
> producer present, this becomes an infinite loop.
>
> The above two bugs are needed for the lock up, as well as the
> mentioned patch. Without the patch, the function filter is activated
> whenever we pass in a filter, even if we do not select any function.
> The patch changes that to only activate the filter if we succeed in
> selecting a function.
>
> Back to the bugs.
>
> Without KALLSYMS, we never select a function, but we still activate
> the filter. This causes all functions to be disabled from tracing.
> The dynamic ftrace self test fails because it never sees the selected
> function get traced.
>
> With the patch and without KALLSYMS selected, we now do not activate
> the filter, because no function was selected (all compares of a given
> name to a NULL pointer will fail). Now all functions are still enabled
> to be traced.
>
> So, what happens? The dynamic function tracer self test will call
> the test routine while the tracer is still on. The self test will
> start consuming all the cpu ring buffers to test them, and will not
> end until they are all finished. But you also have RCU_TORTURE selected.
> The RCU torture test will run, filling up the ring buffer on other
> CPUS. The consumer will never catch up, and we run forever!
Can this problem hit other types of consumers - the
/debug/tracing/ ones?
> Both of these are true bugs that have been in ftrace for a long time.
> I think they are candidates for getting in 29, even this late in
> the game. You never know what other config combination can hit these
> bugs.
>
> The fixes are simple. One is to simply disable the ring buffer
> while the consumer runs. This prevents any producer from keeping
> the consumer from finishing. The other is to make the function
> tracer select KALLSYMS.
>
> And yes, this was a bitch to debug. This was all I did today :-(
Looks quite subtle indeed.
It might be a safer approach to switch the self-test to
excercise the actual /debug/tracing paths, instead of having its
own home-brewn access methods. That way we debug all those
facilities too - beyond having a self-test - and will avoid bugs
like this too perhaps.
> Please pull the latest tip/tracing/urgent tree, which can be found at:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rostedt/linux-2.6-trace.git
> tip/tracing/urgent
>
>
> Steven Rostedt (2):
> tracing: disable tracing while testing ring buffer
> tracing: have function trace select kallsyms
>
> ----
> kernel/trace/Kconfig | 2 ++
> kernel/trace/trace_selftest.c | 9 +++++++++
> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
Pulled into tip:tracing/urgent, thanks Steve!
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-19 9:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-19 3:35 Steven Rostedt
2009-02-19 3:35 ` [PATCH 1/2] tracing: disable tracing while testing ring buffer Steven Rostedt
2009-02-19 3:35 ` [PATCH 2/2] tracing: have function trace select kallsyms Steven Rostedt
2009-02-19 9:19 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-02-19 18:07 ` [PATCH 0/2] [git pull] tip updates for 2.6.29 Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090219091943.GB2354@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®