From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758922AbZBSNBR (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Feb 2009 08:01:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753487AbZBSNBC (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Feb 2009 08:01:02 -0500 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:47892 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753299AbZBSNBA (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Feb 2009 08:01:00 -0500 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: [Bug #12667] Badness at kernel/time/timekeeping.c:98 in pmud (timekeeping_suspended) Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:00:52 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.0 (Linux/2.6.29-rc5-tst; KDE/4.2.0; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Paul Collins , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner References: <87r61uzv95.fsf@burly.wgtn.ondioline.org> <1235032710.8805.37.camel@pasglop> In-Reply-To: <1235032710.8805.37.camel@pasglop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200902191400.53528.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 19 February 2009, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Thu, 2009-02-19 at 21:27 +1300, Paul Collins wrote: > > > Just for laughs I slapped together the following, which seems to do > > the > > > job, although not especially tidily. > > > > And it doesn't even do the job. Judging by this new trace, submitting > > input events from the via-pmu resume function is still too early. > > > What's up Thomas ? We can't call gettimeofday() from a sysdev > suspend/resume ? That's a little bit too harsh no ? Perhaps the ordering is wrong (ie. via-pmu resume happens bevore timekeeping resume)? Rafael