From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1755278AbZBSSwQ@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1755278AbZBSSwQ (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:52:16 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753280AbZBSSwA
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:52:00 -0500
Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:53180 "EHLO
	bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751992AbZBSSv7 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:51:59 -0500
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:51:54 -0500
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Atsushi Tsuji <a-tsuji@bk.jp.nec.com>,
       Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
       Mathieu Desnoyers <compudj@krystal.dyndns.org>,
       "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>,
       Kazuto Miyoshi <miyoshi@linux.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp>,
       linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
       Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
       Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>, Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add tracepoints to track pagecache transition
Message-ID: <20090219185154.GA24117@infradead.org>
References: <499A7CAD.9030409@bk.jp.nec.com> <1234863220.4744.34.camel@laptop> <499A99BC.2080700@bk.jp.nec.com> <alpine.DEB.1.10.0902171021320.910@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0902171021320.910@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from <hch@infradead.org> by bombadil.infradead.org
	See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 10:24:46AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, Atsushi Tsuji wrote:
> > > 
> > > This is rather asymmetric, why don't we care about the offset for the
> > > removed page?
> > > 
> > 
> > Indeed.
> > I added the offset to the argument for the removed page and resend fixed patch.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Atsushi Tsuji <a-tsuji@bk.jp.nec.com>
> 
> Could you package it up in one patch again and resend with [PATCH v2].
> Also make sure to Cc the memory folks, and ask for an Acked-by from them.

Well, until we actually get a consumer of those tracepoints, e.g. a
ftrace pluging into the tree strong NACK for me.

(p.s. I really don't get it why people keep trying to push dead code
 into the tree)