From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756947AbZBSS7d (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:59:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753579AbZBSS7V (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:59:21 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:60016 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753798AbZBSS7U (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:59:20 -0500 Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:59:19 -0500 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Steven Whitehouse Cc: cluster-devel@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrace@vger.kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk Subject: Re: GFS2: Add blktrace support to glocks Message-ID: <20090219185919.GB28490@infradead.org> References: <1235062539.9571.771.camel@quoit> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1235062539.9571.771.camel@quoit> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 04:55:39PM +0000, Steven Whitehouse wrote: > Hi, > > Since I last posted this pair of patches, I've done some extensive > updating of the kernel patch, so it should now be happy to compile > under all possible Kconfigs (fingers crossed) and also its a fair > bit cleaner too. > > I'm adding the linux-btrace list, since I didn't know about that > list when I made the initial posting. > > Since there is probably more GFS2 changes than blktrace changes, I > could push this through the GFS2 tree. Let me know if you'd prefer > it to go via the blktrace tree. I'd like to be able to push this > in at the next merge window if possible. This patch is against the > head of the GFS2 -nmw git tree (obviously that makes no difference > to the blktrace side of the patch). > > An updated blktrace userland patch follows in the next email, although > the changes from the last version are fairly minor, Umm, why would you put fs internal stuff into blktrace? Just use the generic ringbuffer directly and trace into that one.