From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754897AbZBTJbm (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Feb 2009 04:31:42 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752947AbZBTJbe (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Feb 2009 04:31:34 -0500 Received: from silver.sucs.swan.ac.uk ([137.44.10.1]:39795 "EHLO silver.sucs.swan.ac.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752774AbZBTJbd (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Feb 2009 04:31:33 -0500 Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 09:31:31 +0000 From: Sitsofe Wheeler To: Justin Piszcz Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: General question (scheduler) with SSDs? Message-ID: <20090220093131.GA26124@silver.sucs.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 08:38:38AM -0500, Justin Piszcz wrote: > Hello, > > I was curious if anyone had done any benchmarks and/or has conclusive > information, what is the best Linux scheduler to use with SSDs? > > Noop? > CFQ? > AS? > Deadline? As mentioned in another mail :wq -- Sitsofe | http://sucs.org/~sits/