From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [rfd] function-graph augmentation
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 10:30:11 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090220133011.GB16897@ghostprotocols.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090220085627.GE24555@elte.hu>
Em Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 09:56:27AM +0100, Ingo Molnar escreveu:
> 2)
>
> Another, entirely different, and i think complementary approach,
> which exciting new possibilities would be to (also)
> automatically pick up arguments from the stack, on function
> entry.
>
> If there's a (read-mostly, lockless-to-read and scalable)
> function attributes hash, then we could encode the parameters
> signature of functions (or at least, of certain functions) in
> the attributes hash. Then the tracer will know how many
> arguments to pick up from the stack.
>
> This approach has the advantage that we could reconstruct the
> parameters of _arbitrary_ functions, without having to touch
> those functions. We already enumerate all functions during build
> time, it would take some more dwarf2 magic to recover the
> call/parameter signature. Oh, and at that time we could also
> record the _return type_ - easing the return value.
>
> Note that it does not take a full, bloated DEBUG_INFO build - we
> can build a -g object to get the dwarf2 data and then strip out
> the dwarf2 data.
>
> Arnaldo, what do you think about this, how feasible would it be
> to put dwarf2 magic into scripts/recordmcount.pl?
/me reading scripts/recordmcount.pl...
- Arnaldo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-20 13:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-19 21:01 Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-19 21:28 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-02-19 21:38 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-02-20 8:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-20 13:30 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2009-02-20 14:04 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2009-02-20 14:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-20 14:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-20 14:32 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2009-02-20 14:36 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-02-20 8:39 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090220133011.GB16897@ghostprotocols.net \
--to=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jbaron@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=srostedt@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome