From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755062AbZBTUuV (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:50:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751720AbZBTUuH (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:50:07 -0500 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:57297 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751389AbZBTUuG (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:50:06 -0500 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Matthew Garrett Subject: Re: [RFD] Automatic suspend Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 21:49:24 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.0 (Linux/2.6.29-rc5-tst; KDE/4.2.0; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Pavel Machek , Arjan van de Ven , "Woodruff, Richard" , Alan Stern , Kyle Moffett , Oliver Neukum , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , pm list , LKML , "Arve Hj?nnev?g" , Nigel Cunningham , mark gross , Uli Luckas , Igor Stoppa , Brian Swetland , Len Brown References: <20090220182213.GA1681@ucw.cz> <20090220182609.GA3289@srcf.ucam.org> In-Reply-To: <20090220182609.GA3289@srcf.ucam.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200902202149.25990.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Friday 20 February 2009, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 07:22:15PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > > On Mon 2009-02-16 23:23:30, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 12:19:38AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > > > > This, again, seems to be a bit x86-centric. :-) The Android people are telling > > > > us that on the hardware they deal with it does make sense to put the entire > > > > system to sleep even for relatively short periods of time, since the latencies > > > > involved are not too bad. > > > > > > Arve said that the power state was equivalent in idle and suspend, but > > > > ...for Arve's hardware. Not all embedded systems are like that, and > > OLPC / PCs are definitely not like that. > > And PCs have enough latency over suspend/resume that we can't do it > automatically in a non-intrusive manner anyway, so runtime pm is more > interesting there as well. Agreed. Thanks, Rafael