From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755940AbZBVRFO (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Feb 2009 12:05:14 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754185AbZBVRFA (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Feb 2009 12:05:00 -0500 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:41975 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754027AbZBVRE7 (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Feb 2009 12:04:59 -0500 Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 18:04:40 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Andreas Herrmann Cc: Thomas Gleixner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mark Hounschell , Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] x86: dish of assorted hpet patches Message-ID: <20090222170440.GA8343@elte.hu> References: <20090220230729.GK4834@alberich.amd.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090220230729.GK4834@alberich.amd.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Andreas Herrmann wrote: > - to print HPET registers during setup, > - to fix a real issue with HZ_1000 kernels on an SB400 system > (and to potentially fix a similar issue with SB600). > > Tested on ICH7 and on AMD SB400, AMD SB600. applied to tip:timers/hpet, thanks Andreas! Btw, maybe the HZ_1000 bugfix could be the fix for a weirdness i'm seeing very rarely on one of my testsystems: [ 8.850706] bus: 'pci': driver_probe_device: matched device 0000:04:00.0 with driver e1000e [ 8.850706] bus: 'pci': really_probe: probing driver e1000e with device 0000:04:00.0 [ 177.308165] e1000e 0000:04:00.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 17 (level, low) -> IRQ 17 [ 177.668182] e1000e 0000:04:00.0: setting latency timer to 64 there's almost 3 minutes between those lines printed, although it should have taken milliseconds! Ingo