From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752860AbZBWGEq (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Feb 2009 01:04:46 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751447AbZBWGEh (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Feb 2009 01:04:37 -0500 Received: from TYO202.gate.nec.co.jp ([202.32.8.206]:59117 "EHLO tyo202.gate.nec.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751356AbZBWGEg (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Feb 2009 01:04:36 -0500 Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:58:28 +0900 From: Daisuke Nishimura To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com" , "lizf@cn.fujitsu.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Reduce size of swap_cgroup by CSS ID v2 Message-Id: <20090223145828.d14ff015.nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> In-Reply-To: <20090209145557.d0754a9f.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> References: <20090205185959.7971dee4.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20090209145557.d0754a9f.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Organization: NEC Soft, Ltd. X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.8 (GTK+ 2.10.14; i686-pc-mingw32) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I'm sorry for my late reply. It looks good basically, but I have 1 comment. > static struct mem_cgroup *try_get_mem_cgroup_from_swapcache(struct page *page) > { > - struct mem_cgroup *mem; > + unsigned short id; > + struct mem_cgroup *mem = NULL; > swp_entry_t ent; > > if (!PageSwapCache(page)) > return NULL; > > ent.val = page_private(page); > - mem = lookup_swap_cgroup(ent); > - if (!mem) > - return NULL; > + id = lookup_swap_cgroup(ent); > + rcu_read_lock(); > + mem = mem_cgroup_lookup(id); > if (!css_tryget(&mem->css)) We should check whether "mem" is NULL or not before css_tryget, because "mem" can be NULL(or "id" can be 0) if the page is on swapcache, that is, remove_from_swap_cache has not been called yet. Actually, I got NULL pointer dereference bug here. > - return NULL; > + mem = NULL; > + rcu_read_unlock(); > return mem; > } > Thanks, Daisuke Nishimura.